Analyzing the Effect of Linguistic Instructions on Paraphrase Generation

Proceedings of the Joint 25th Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics and 11th Baltic Conference on Human Language Technologies (NoDaLiDa/Baltic-HLT 2025), pages 755–766 March 3-4, 2025 ©2025 University of Tartu LibraryAnalyzing the Effect of Linguistic Instructions on Paraphrase Generation Teemu Vahtola1 Songbo Hu2 Mathias Creutz1 Ivan Vuli´c2 Anna Korhonen2 Jörg Tiedemann1 1Unversity of Helsinki, Finland 2Language Technology Lab, University of Cambridge, UK {teemu.vahtola, mathias.creutz, jorg.tiedemann}@helsinki.fi {sh2091, iv250, alk23}@cam.ac.uk Abstract Recent work has demonstrated that large language models can often generate flu- ent and linguistically correct text, adhering to given instructions. However, to what extent can they execute complex instruc- tions requiring knowledge of fundamental linguistic concepts and elaborate semantic reasoning? Our study connects an established linguis- tic theory of paraphrasing with LLM-based practice to analyze which specific types of paraphrases LLMs can accurately produce and where they still struggle. To this end, we investigate a method of analyzing para- phrases generated by LLMs prompted with a comprehensive set of systematic linguis- tic instructions. We conduct a case study using GPT-4, which has shown strong per- formance across various language genera- tion tasks, and we believe that other LLMs may face similar challenges in comparable scenarios. We examine GPT-4 from a linguistic per- spective to explore its potential contribu- tions to linguistic research regarding para- phrasing, systematically assessing how ac- curately the model generates paraphrases that adhere to specified transformation rules. Our results suggest that GPT-4 fre- quently prioritizes simple lexical or syn- tactic alternations, often disregarding the transformation guidelines if they overly complicate the primary task.

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2025-02-19
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing the Effect of Linguistic Instructions on Paraphrase Generation

Open MIND
Topic Modeling
article

Analyzing the Effect of Linguistic Instructions on Paraphrase Generation

article en

Abstract

Proceedings of the Joint 25th Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics and 11th Baltic Conference on Human Language Technologies (NoDaLiDa/Baltic-HLT 2025), pages 755–766 March 3-4, 2025 ©2025 University of Tartu LibraryAnalyzing the Effect of Linguistic Instructions on Paraphrase Generation Teemu Vahtola1 Songbo Hu2 Mathias Creutz1 Ivan Vuli´c2 Anna Korhonen2 Jörg Tiedemann1 1Unversity of Helsinki, Finland 2Language Technology Lab, University of Cambridge, UK {teemu.vahtola, mathias.creutz, jorg.tiedemann}@helsinki.fi {sh2091, iv250, alk23}@cam.ac.uk Abstract Recent work has demonstrated that large language models can often generate flu- ent and linguistically correct text, adhering to given instructions. However, to what extent can they execute complex instruc- tions requiring knowledge of fundamental linguistic concepts and elaborate semantic reasoning? Our study connects an established linguis- tic theory of paraphrasing with LLM-based practice to analyze which specific types of paraphrases LLMs can accurately produce and where they still struggle. To this end, we investigate a method of analyzing para- phrases generated by LLMs prompted with a comprehensive set of systematic linguis- tic instructions. We conduct a case study using GPT-4, which has shown strong per- formance across various language genera- tion tasks, and we believe that other LLMs may face similar challenges in comparable scenarios. We examine GPT-4 from a linguistic per- spective to explore its potential contribu- tions to linguistic research regarding para- phrasing, systematically assessing how ac- curately the model generates paraphrases that adhere to specified transformation rules. Our results suggest that GPT-4 fre- quently prioritizes simple lexical or syn- tactic alternations, often disregarding the transformation guidelines if they overly complicate the primary task.

Open MIND
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analyzing the Effect of Linguistic Instructions on Paraphrase Generation · Open MIND (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS