AMERICAN COMMUNICATIVE STYLE IN THE CONTEXT OF ACADEMIC DISCOURSE

Background. In today's globalized world, the study of communicative styles plays a crucial role in fostering cross-cultural understanding and engagement across various fields. As cultural boundaries become increasingly interconnected, examining different communicative practices helps to bridge gaps in understanding, promote more inclusive dialogue, and enhance cooperation in diverse contexts. Among these, American academic discourse is of particular significance as its conventions and norms shape the way knowledge is communicated and shared worldwide. Its impact extends far beyond English-speaking nations, influencing higher educational frameworks, research methodologies, and scientific cooperation in many countries. Methods. The study employs the descriptive method to examine the characteristics of the American communicative style. Discourse analysis is applied to analyze the research material to identify face-saving strategies, which refer to methods of preserving one's positive self-presentation during the communication process. Results. Drawing on P. Brown and S. Levinson's face theory, the study proves that saving both "positive" and "negative" faces is a defining characteristic of the American communicative style in the academe. The strategies can be seen as representations of cultural preferences for interaction, cooperation, and mutual respect in academic environments. Conclusions. American communicative style prioritizes saving both "positive" and "negative" faces, ensuring a balance between personal rapport and respect for individual autonomy. In academic discourse, "positive face" refers to the desire to be accepted, valued, and appreciated by others, which is achieved through addressing one another by name, using inclusive language, and expressing agreement. "Negative face" relates to the wish for autonomy and freedom from imposition. It is realized through using approximators, modal verbs, and impersonal phrases, which helps maintain distance and politeness.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AMERICAN COMMUNICATIVE STYLE IN THE CONTEXT OF ACADEMIC DISCOURSE

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
article

AMERICAN COMMUNICATIVE STYLE IN THE CONTEXT OF ACADEMIC DISCOURSE

article en

Abstract

Background. In today's globalized world, the study of communicative styles plays a crucial role in fostering cross-cultural understanding and engagement across various fields. As cultural boundaries become increasingly interconnected, examining different communicative practices helps to bridge gaps in understanding, promote more inclusive dialogue, and enhance cooperation in diverse contexts. Among these, American academic discourse is of particular significance as its conventions and norms shape the way knowledge is communicated and shared worldwide. Its impact extends far beyond English-speaking nations, influencing higher educational frameworks, research methodologies, and scientific cooperation in many countries. Methods. The study employs the descriptive method to examine the characteristics of the American communicative style. Discourse analysis is applied to analyze the research material to identify face-saving strategies, which refer to methods of preserving one's positive self-presentation during the communication process. Results. Drawing on P. Brown and S. Levinson's face theory, the study proves that saving both "positive" and "negative" faces is a defining characteristic of the American communicative style in the academe. The strategies can be seen as representations of cultural preferences for interaction, cooperation, and mutual respect in academic environments. Conclusions. American communicative style prioritizes saving both "positive" and "negative" faces, ensuring a balance between personal rapport and respect for individual autonomy. In academic discourse, "positive face" refers to the desire to be accepted, valued, and appreciated by others, which is achieved through addressing one another by name, using inclusive language, and expressing agreement. "Negative face" relates to the wish for autonomy and freedom from imposition. It is realized through using approximators, modal verbs, and impersonal phrases, which helps maintain distance and politeness.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (UA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.