Artificial Intelligence in fast-response organizations: Utopic and dystopic reconciliation

<p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming organizations’ work practices and the management of it has piqued IS scholars’ attention. IS scholars have explored the factors that affect AI use and practice fields that emerge from its use in organizations. Our study examines how fast-response organizations’ actors perceive AI implementation in their workplace. Based on an interpretive qualitative study, we find that, first, police professionals have AI utopic and dystopic narratives. Utopic narratives surround AI’s transformational and utilitarian value while the dystopic narratives about AI in their work include AI-caution and AI deontological issue. Second, our preliminary findings reveal fostering AI transparency and expanding AI conversations as temporal reconciliation mechanisms to the utopic and dystopic narratives. This paper extends AI management by examining the phenomenon in fast-response organizations and brings to attention the utopic and dystopic views of police professionals that policymakers need to consider while attempting to regulate AI in policing.</p>

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-09-27
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in fast-response organizations: Utopic and dystopic reconciliation

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial Intelligence in fast-response organizations: Utopic and dystopic reconciliation

article en

Abstract

<p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming organizations’ work practices and the management of it has piqued IS scholars’ attention. IS scholars have explored the factors that affect AI use and practice fields that emerge from its use in organizations. Our study examines how fast-response organizations’ actors perceive AI implementation in their workplace. Based on an interpretive qualitative study, we find that, first, police professionals have AI utopic and dystopic narratives. Utopic narratives surround AI’s transformational and utilitarian value while the dystopic narratives about AI in their work include AI-caution and AI deontological issue. Second, our preliminary findings reveal fostering AI transparency and expanding AI conversations as temporal reconciliation mechanisms to the utopic and dystopic narratives. This paper extends AI management by examining the phenomenon in fast-response organizations and brings to attention the utopic and dystopic views of police professionals that policymakers need to consider while attempting to regulate AI in policing.</p>

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Intelligence in fast-response organizations: Utopic and dystopic reconciliation · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS