For you, by who? Undergraduate students enacting critical digital literacy with the TikTok "for you page" algorithm.

This project explores undergraduate students’ digital literacy practices and algorithmic beliefs and awareness on algorithmically driven social media platforms like the TikTok For You Page (FYP). TikTok is a very successful social media platform with over 135 million users in the U.S. alone, nearly half of the U.S. population (Statista, 2025a). Central to TikTok’s popularity and success is its unique technological infrastructure, specifically the underlying algorithm of the FYP that shapes user experience. With a mixed-methods approach, I utilize survey data and text-based interviews (Prior, 2004) to examine participants’ experiences on the TikTok FYP. Drawing on a technofeminist methodology (Wacjman, 2005; Blair, 2012; Almjeld, 2019) to prioritize participants’ lived experiences and consider broader power structures shaping their FYPs, I critically examine and unpack the complex relationship between social media users and the TikTok FYP algorithm. My research demonstrates that participants often hold partial, speculative, or even conspiratorial beliefs and understandings of how the FYP algorithm functions, but these beliefs nonetheless play a central role in how they engage with the platform. Utilizing critical digital literacy (Hutchinson & Novotny, 2021) as a framework to study users’ experiences on the TikTok FYP, I examine participants’ practices and beliefs to highlight how their interactions with the platform are shaped not only by the algorithm but also by their perceptions of it. Ultimately, I argue that users’ digital literacy practices and algorithmic beliefs and awareness develop together, constantly informing and reshaping one another through extended use of the TikTok FYP. Algorithms are both ubiquitous and pervasive, often operating beneath the surface of everyday digital experiences, and that invisibility makes them even more important to understand. This research demonstrates the need to critically examine how users make sense of algorithms and respond to hyper-personalized content. As social media platforms increasingly mediate access to information and entertainment, studying how literacy practices and algorithmic beliefs develop together reveals how users navigate digital platforms and negotiate issues of agency, privacy, and power.

Publication Details

Journal
ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

For you, by who? Undergraduate students enacting critical digital literacy with the TikTok "for you page" algorithm.

ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville)
Digital Education and Society
article

For you, by who? Undergraduate students enacting critical digital literacy with the TikTok "for you page" algorithm.

article en

Abstract

This project explores undergraduate students’ digital literacy practices and algorithmic beliefs and awareness on algorithmically driven social media platforms like the TikTok For You Page (FYP). TikTok is a very successful social media platform with over 135 million users in the U.S. alone, nearly half of the U.S. population (Statista, 2025a). Central to TikTok’s popularity and success is its unique technological infrastructure, specifically the underlying algorithm of the FYP that shapes user experience. With a mixed-methods approach, I utilize survey data and text-based interviews (Prior, 2004) to examine participants’ experiences on the TikTok FYP. Drawing on a technofeminist methodology (Wacjman, 2005; Blair, 2012; Almjeld, 2019) to prioritize participants’ lived experiences and consider broader power structures shaping their FYPs, I critically examine and unpack the complex relationship between social media users and the TikTok FYP algorithm. My research demonstrates that participants often hold partial, speculative, or even conspiratorial beliefs and understandings of how the FYP algorithm functions, but these beliefs nonetheless play a central role in how they engage with the platform. Utilizing critical digital literacy (Hutchinson & Novotny, 2021) as a framework to study users’ experiences on the TikTok FYP, I examine participants’ practices and beliefs to highlight how their interactions with the platform are shaped not only by the algorithm but also by their perceptions of it. Ultimately, I argue that users’ digital literacy practices and algorithmic beliefs and awareness develop together, constantly informing and reshaping one another through extended use of the TikTok FYP. Algorithms are both ubiquitous and pervasive, often operating beneath the surface of everyday digital experiences, and that invisibility makes them even more important to understand. This research demonstrates the need to critically examine how users make sense of algorithms and respond to hyper-personalized content. As social media platforms increasingly mediate access to information and entertainment, studying how literacy practices and algorithmic beliefs develop together reveals how users navigate digital platforms and negotiate issues of agency, privacy, and power.

ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.