What technological factors influence Chinese college student engagement in a smart classroom learning environment: Ease of use, perceived usefulness, or multiple sources?

Smart classrooms equipped with advanced technologies and designed to enhance students’ learning outcomes are proliferating in many countries, including China. The impact of technological factors on student engagement in smart classroom learning environments (SCLEs) is crucial for shaping the future development of smart classrooms and guiding teachers' training in information technologies. This study delves into the influence of technological factors on student engagement in SCLEs across three dimensions: ease of use, perceived usefulness, and multiple sources. Data were purposefully collected from a cohort of 217 college students enrolled in at least one smart classroom course during the study period. The empirical evidence suggests that these three factors exert varying effects on student engagement. Unexpectedly, only students’ perception of multiple sources positively predicts student engagement in SCLEs, while perceived usefulness is negatively correlated with student engagement. Surprisingly, ease of use is not significantly associated with student engagement. This study underscores the limited impact of students' perceptions of technology on their engagement levels, emphasizing instead the importance of pedagogical and social support provided by these technologies in SCLEs. Educators should prioritize such support mechanisms to foster greater student engagement in smart classroom environments.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What technological factors influence Chinese college student engagement in a smart classroom learning environment: Ease of use, perceived usefulness, or multiple sources?

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
article

What technological factors influence Chinese college student engagement in a smart classroom learning environment: Ease of use, perceived usefulness, or multiple sources?

article en

Abstract

Smart classrooms equipped with advanced technologies and designed to enhance students’ learning outcomes are proliferating in many countries, including China. The impact of technological factors on student engagement in smart classroom learning environments (SCLEs) is crucial for shaping the future development of smart classrooms and guiding teachers' training in information technologies. This study delves into the influence of technological factors on student engagement in SCLEs across three dimensions: ease of use, perceived usefulness, and multiple sources. Data were purposefully collected from a cohort of 217 college students enrolled in at least one smart classroom course during the study period. The empirical evidence suggests that these three factors exert varying effects on student engagement. Unexpectedly, only students’ perception of multiple sources positively predicts student engagement in SCLEs, while perceived usefulness is negatively correlated with student engagement. Surprisingly, ease of use is not significantly associated with student engagement. This study underscores the limited impact of students' perceptions of technology on their engagement levels, emphasizing instead the importance of pedagogical and social support provided by these technologies in SCLEs. Educators should prioritize such support mechanisms to foster greater student engagement in smart classroom environments.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.