ДІАЛЕКТИКА І ТРИ ПАРАДИГМИ СТРАТИГРАФІЇ

From the standpoint of the basic laws of dialectics – negation of negation, unity and struggle of the main opposites of stratigraphy – geological space and geological time – the sequence of appearance and change of three paradigms of stratigraphy is considered. These are the Unified Stratigraphic Scale (USS), the dualistic system of regional and global scales and modern chronostratigraphy. It is shown that the USS and the “dualistic” system are based on the historical dimension of time (geochronology), and chronostratigraphy is based on geoastronomical time independent of history (geochronometry). It is confirmed that the regional biostratigraphic material stratons of the USS and the “dualistic” system are mapped, while the global chronostratons of the modern paradigm, defined solely by age, are artificial and are not mapped. It is concluded that, from the standpoint of dialectics, the appearance and success of the chronostratigraphy paradigm is the result of the absolutization of time in the struggle between opposing concepts – geological space and geological time and in the substitution of historical time (the basis of geochronology) by physical time (chronometry).

Publication Details

Journal
The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Published
2024-12-30
Primary Topic
Geological Studies and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ДІАЛЕКТИКА І ТРИ ПАРАДИГМИ СТРАТИГРАФІЇ

The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Geological Studies and Exploration
article

ДІАЛЕКТИКА І ТРИ ПАРАДИГМИ СТРАТИГРАФІЇ

article en

Abstract

From the standpoint of the basic laws of dialectics – negation of negation, unity and struggle of the main opposites of stratigraphy – geological space and geological time – the sequence of appearance and change of three paradigms of stratigraphy is considered. These are the Unified Stratigraphic Scale (USS), the dualistic system of regional and global scales and modern chronostratigraphy. It is shown that the USS and the “dualistic” system are based on the historical dimension of time (geochronology), and chronostratigraphy is based on geoastronomical time independent of history (geochronometry). It is confirmed that the regional biostratigraphic material stratons of the USS and the “dualistic” system are mapped, while the global chronostratons of the modern paradigm, defined solely by age, are artificial and are not mapped. It is concluded that, from the standpoint of dialectics, the appearance and success of the chronostratigraphy paradigm is the result of the absolutization of time in the struggle between opposing concepts – geological space and geological time and in the substitution of historical time (the basis of geochronology) by physical time (chronometry).

The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Geological Studies and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.