Wildlife Strike Risks in Helicopter Operations: Strategic Insights for Advanced Air Mobility

Wildlife Strike Risks in Helicopter Operations: Strategic Insights for Advanced Air Mobility Taeyun Kim and Auguste Starkute – Graduate Students Faculty Mentor - Flavio A. C. Mendonca – PhD., MSc., MBA Email: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) and helicopter operations in urban environments typically take place at lower altitudes and speeds compared to traditional air travel. This positions them above congested airspace but within the altitude range where nearly 95% of wildlife strikes occur (below 3,500 feet above ground level). Consequently, wildlife hazards pose a significant concern for AAM safety. This study aimed to address this issue by achieving two main objectives: (1) Analyzing trends in wildlife strikes involving helicopters, and (2) identifying factors that predict both non-damaging and damaging strikes. We analyzed helicopter wildlife strike data from the Federal Aviation Administration's wildlife strike database, spanning 2013 to 2022. The study focused on six key predictors of damaging bird strikes: helicopter airspeed, altitude, phase of flight, time of day, sky conditions, and bird size. The occurrences of both non-damaging and damaging wildlife strikes served as the dependent variables. Binary logistic regression and trend analysis were employed to forecast strike occurrences based on these variables. The findings of this study will enhance our understanding of wildlife strikes involving helicopters and support the development of integrated safety measures for AAM operations. @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}@font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536859905 -1073732485 9 0 511 0;}@font-face {font-family:"Malgun Gothic"; panose-1:2 11 5 3 2 0 0 2 0 4; mso-font-alt:"맑은 고딕"; mso-font-charset:129; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1879048145 701988091 18 0 524289 0;}@font-face {font-family:"\@Malgun Gothic"; mso-font-charset:129; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1879048145 701988091 18 0 524289 0;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Malgun Gothic"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;}a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:#467886; mso-themecolor:hyperlink; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;}a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; color:#96607D; mso-themecolor:followedhyperlink; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;}p {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}.MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Aptos; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Malgun Gothic"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Aptos; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}.MsoPapDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; margin-bottom:8.0pt; line-height:115%;}div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;}

Publication Details

Journal
Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University)
Published
2025-01-22
Primary Topic
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wildlife Strike Risks in Helicopter Operations: Strategic Insights for Advanced Air Mobility

Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University)
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
article

Wildlife Strike Risks in Helicopter Operations: Strategic Insights for Advanced Air Mobility

article en

Abstract

Wildlife Strike Risks in Helicopter Operations: Strategic Insights for Advanced Air Mobility Taeyun Kim and Auguste Starkute – Graduate Students Faculty Mentor - Flavio A. C. Mendonca – PhD., MSc., MBA Email: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) and helicopter operations in urban environments typically take place at lower altitudes and speeds compared to traditional air travel. This positions them above congested airspace but within the altitude range where nearly 95% of wildlife strikes occur (below 3,500 feet above ground level). Consequently, wildlife hazards pose a significant concern for AAM safety. This study aimed to address this issue by achieving two main objectives: (1) Analyzing trends in wildlife strikes involving helicopters, and (2) identifying factors that predict both non-damaging and damaging strikes. We analyzed helicopter wildlife strike data from the Federal Aviation Administration's wildlife strike database, spanning 2013 to 2022. The study focused on six key predictors of damaging bird strikes: helicopter airspeed, altitude, phase of flight, time of day, sky conditions, and bird size. The occurrences of both non-damaging and damaging wildlife strikes served as the dependent variables. Binary logistic regression and trend analysis were employed to forecast strike occurrences based on these variables. The findings of this study will enhance our understanding of wildlife strikes involving helicopters and support the development of integrated safety measures for AAM operations. @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}@font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536859905 -1073732485 9 0 511 0;}@font-face {font-family:"Malgun Gothic"; panose-1:2 11 5 3 2 0 0 2 0 4; mso-font-alt:"맑은 고딕"; mso-font-charset:129; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1879048145 701988091 18 0 524289 0;}@font-face {font-family:"\@Malgun Gothic"; mso-font-charset:129; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1879048145 701988091 18 0 524289 0;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Malgun Gothic"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;}a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:#467886; mso-themecolor:hyperlink; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;}a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; color:#96607D; mso-themecolor:followedhyperlink; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;}p {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}.MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Aptos; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Malgun Gothic"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Aptos; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}.MsoPapDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; margin-bottom:8.0pt; line-height:115%;}div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;}

Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.