For Your Predicament or Your Success? Understanding Lenders' Decisions in Lending-based Prosocial Crowdfunding

Prosocial lending is a specific form of crowdfunding where lenders’ decisions involve considerations related to both charitable donations and financial investment. While prior literature has explored how these considerations are reflected in lenders' assessments of borrowers' narrative orientations and their characteristics, the impact of the interplay between these different assessment bases on crowdfunding outcomes remains unclear. To address this gap, our study has developed a model by integrating expectancy violation theory and stereotype content theory. It suggests that emotional variability could enhance the positive impact of socially oriented narratives on crowdfunding speed, while it could amplify the negative impact of financially oriented narratives on crowdfunding speed. A preliminary survival analysis of 173,646 loan requests from Kiva, a leading prosocial lending platform, corroborates these hypotheses. Our findings are expected to contribute to both academic understanding and practical approaches to optimizing prosocial crowdfunding performance.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

For Your Predicament or Your Success? Understanding Lenders' Decisions in Lending-based Prosocial Crowdfunding

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

For Your Predicament or Your Success? Understanding Lenders' Decisions in Lending-based Prosocial Crowdfunding

article en

Abstract

Prosocial lending is a specific form of crowdfunding where lenders’ decisions involve considerations related to both charitable donations and financial investment. While prior literature has explored how these considerations are reflected in lenders' assessments of borrowers' narrative orientations and their characteristics, the impact of the interplay between these different assessment bases on crowdfunding outcomes remains unclear. To address this gap, our study has developed a model by integrating expectancy violation theory and stereotype content theory. It suggests that emotional variability could enhance the positive impact of socially oriented narratives on crowdfunding speed, while it could amplify the negative impact of financially oriented narratives on crowdfunding speed. A preliminary survival analysis of 173,646 loan requests from Kiva, a leading prosocial lending platform, corroborates these hypotheses. Our findings are expected to contribute to both academic understanding and practical approaches to optimizing prosocial crowdfunding performance.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

For Your Predicament or Your Success? Understanding Lenders' Decisions in Lending-based Prosocial Crowdfunding · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS