Understanding the impact of regulatory reforms in children's residential child care : findings from an evidence review

Children’s residential care in the United Kingdom is regulated by separate agencies in the four home nations to which responsibility for this area of public policy is devolved. The development of these regulatory systems has followed a long sequence of inquiries and scandals that have exposed serious failings in the provision of care to some children and young people. This article reports the findings of an evidence review considering the impact of regulatory reforms as part of a wider research project comparing the development of different systems of regulation across England and Wales. We identify four key themes from this review that should be addressed in the design of regulatory systems and explored through further research. These include: (1) balancing the enforcement of minimum standards against support for service improvement; (2) improving worker autonomy and relationship building with children and young people; (3) addressing unresolved debates regarding minimum qualification and ongoing training requirements; and (4) a stronger focus on organisational cultures and leadership within children’s residential homes and care home groups.

Publication Details

Journal
Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)
Published
2025-05-22
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the impact of regulatory reforms in children's residential child care : findings from an evidence review

Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

Understanding the impact of regulatory reforms in children's residential child care : findings from an evidence review

article en

Abstract

Children’s residential care in the United Kingdom is regulated by separate agencies in the four home nations to which responsibility for this area of public policy is devolved. The development of these regulatory systems has followed a long sequence of inquiries and scandals that have exposed serious failings in the provision of care to some children and young people. This article reports the findings of an evidence review considering the impact of regulatory reforms as part of a wider research project comparing the development of different systems of regulation across England and Wales. We identify four key themes from this review that should be addressed in the design of regulatory systems and explored through further research. These include: (1) balancing the enforcement of minimum standards against support for service improvement; (2) improving worker autonomy and relationship building with children and young people; (3) addressing unresolved debates regarding minimum qualification and ongoing training requirements; and (4) a stronger focus on organisational cultures and leadership within children’s residential homes and care home groups.

Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, King's College London, Cardiff University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.