Unravelling the Rationales, Responses and Roles of practitioners when embedding Service Learning:A reflective practice workshop

Higher education institutes (HEIs) increasingly aim to embed (community) service learning practices (Tijsma et al., 2023). However, the rationales (motivations and behaviour) behind embedding service learning can be divergent – both on the individual practitioner level and on the institutional (policy) level (Compagnucci &amp; Spigarelli, 2020; Lounsbury &amp; Pollack, 2001; Taylor &amp; Kahlke, 2017).<br/><br/>In this interactive session, we take a closer look at the various rationales and make you, as a practitioner, more aware of your own rationales in relation to embedding service learning within your institutional context, by considering questions such as: What rationales drive you as a practitioner, researcher, or policy maker to embed service learning practices? And how does this (dis)align with institutional practices? What potential tensions can arise in relation to your own service learning practice? And how can you best deal with or respond to these tensions? We give meaning to this workshop based on the findings of a recently published paper (Tijsma et al., 2024). In this paper we describe different rationales, responses and roles of individual practitioners in relation to embedding service learning.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
VU Research Portal
Published
2024-09-26
Primary Topic
Wind Energy Research and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unravelling the Rationales, Responses and Roles of practitioners when embedding Service Learning:A reflective practice workshop

VU Research Portal
Wind Energy Research and Development
article

Unravelling the Rationales, Responses and Roles of practitioners when embedding Service Learning:A reflective practice workshop

article en

Abstract

Higher education institutes (HEIs) increasingly aim to embed (community) service learning practices (Tijsma et al., 2023). However, the rationales (motivations and behaviour) behind embedding service learning can be divergent – both on the individual practitioner level and on the institutional (policy) level (Compagnucci &amp; Spigarelli, 2020; Lounsbury &amp; Pollack, 2001; Taylor &amp; Kahlke, 2017).<br/><br/>In this interactive session, we take a closer look at the various rationales and make you, as a practitioner, more aware of your own rationales in relation to embedding service learning within your institutional context, by considering questions such as: What rationales drive you as a practitioner, researcher, or policy maker to embed service learning practices? And how does this (dis)align with institutional practices? What potential tensions can arise in relation to your own service learning practice? And how can you best deal with or respond to these tensions? We give meaning to this workshop based on the findings of a recently published paper (Tijsma et al., 2024). In this paper we describe different rationales, responses and roles of individual practitioners in relation to embedding service learning.

VU Research Portal
Athena Sustainable Materials Institute (CA), CNI College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Wind Energy Research and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.