Risk-Sensitive Counterfactual Explanations for AI Model Predictions

Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning techniques excel at making accurate predictions for hard problems. However, the lack of transparency in these black-box models presents significant challenges. Explainable AI (XAI) aims to tackle these challenges by developing methods that provide meaningful explanations for humans to comprehend. However, explanations offered by an XAI method may be inadequate or misleading, causing mistrust and lack of confidence in the AI technology. How to address the risk of misleading explanations has not been studied in the XAI literature. In this paper, we propose a novel method to provide risk-sensitive counterfactual explanations for the predictions of AI models. The proposed method provides robust counterfactuals to mitigate the risk of weak counterfactuals on the one hand and vigilant counterfactuals to reduce the risk of non-responsive counterfactuals on the other hand. We validate the proposed method in an empirical evaluation study using real-world data.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk-Sensitive Counterfactual Explanations for AI Model Predictions

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
article

Risk-Sensitive Counterfactual Explanations for AI Model Predictions

article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning techniques excel at making accurate predictions for hard problems. However, the lack of transparency in these black-box models presents significant challenges. Explainable AI (XAI) aims to tackle these challenges by developing methods that provide meaningful explanations for humans to comprehend. However, explanations offered by an XAI method may be inadequate or misleading, causing mistrust and lack of confidence in the AI technology. How to address the risk of misleading explanations has not been studied in the XAI literature. In this paper, we propose a novel method to provide risk-sensitive counterfactual explanations for the predictions of AI models. The proposed method provides robust counterfactuals to mitigate the risk of weak counterfactuals on the one hand and vigilant counterfactuals to reduce the risk of non-responsive counterfactuals on the other hand. We validate the proposed method in an empirical evaluation study using real-world data.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Risk-Sensitive Counterfactual Explanations for AI Model Predictions · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS