A Quasi-Experimental Non-Equivalent Control Group Study of the Efficacy of an Academic Habits Course on Middle School Students’ Executive Function

The purpose of this quantitative, quasi-experimental, nonequivalent pretest-post-test control group study was to examine the efficacy of executive function training through scaffolded instruction on the executive function skillset between sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade students enrolled in an academic habits course versus those who are not enrolled in an academic habits course at a middle school located in the southeastern United States. While former studies contributed to the literature on the trainability of the executive function skills of middle school students within the clinical setting, this study contributes to the current literature on the trainability of the executive function skills of middle school students using scaffolded instruction within the school building, during school hours. The sample comprised sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade students in a treatment and control group from one suburban middle school; the treatment group had 58 students and the control group had 97 students. Data were collected using the Cognitive-Regulation Index of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function Second Edition Self-Report as both a pre- and post-test. An analysis of covariance was used to test the difference in executive function rating scores between the treatment group and control group when controlling for pretest scores. The results of the data analysis found a significant difference between the executive function skills of middle school students who received executive function training through scaffolded instruction versus those who did not. This study concludes there is a statistically significant difference in executive function rating scores among sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade students who receive scaffolded instruction of executive function skills and those who do not. Recommendations for future research include examining the efficacy of executive function training as part of the school curriculum across different school settings.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)
Published
2025-04-18
Primary Topic
Competency Development and Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Quasi-Experimental Non-Equivalent Control Group Study of the Efficacy of an Academic Habits Course on Middle School Students’ Executive Function

Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)
Competency Development and Evaluation
article

A Quasi-Experimental Non-Equivalent Control Group Study of the Efficacy of an Academic Habits Course on Middle School Students’ Executive Function

article en

Abstract

The purpose of this quantitative, quasi-experimental, nonequivalent pretest-post-test control group study was to examine the efficacy of executive function training through scaffolded instruction on the executive function skillset between sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade students enrolled in an academic habits course versus those who are not enrolled in an academic habits course at a middle school located in the southeastern United States. While former studies contributed to the literature on the trainability of the executive function skills of middle school students within the clinical setting, this study contributes to the current literature on the trainability of the executive function skills of middle school students using scaffolded instruction within the school building, during school hours. The sample comprised sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade students in a treatment and control group from one suburban middle school; the treatment group had 58 students and the control group had 97 students. Data were collected using the Cognitive-Regulation Index of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function Second Edition Self-Report as both a pre- and post-test. An analysis of covariance was used to test the difference in executive function rating scores between the treatment group and control group when controlling for pretest scores. The results of the data analysis found a significant difference between the executive function skills of middle school students who received executive function training through scaffolded instruction versus those who did not. This study concludes there is a statistically significant difference in executive function rating scores among sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade students who receive scaffolded instruction of executive function skills and those who do not. Recommendations for future research include examining the efficacy of executive function training as part of the school curriculum across different school settings.

Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Competency Development and Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.