The role of L1 in EFL Learners’ meaning construal of polysemous nouns

A learner of any foreign language has the arduous task of mastering the vocabulary of that particular language, especially if the person wants to reach a near-native level of proficiency. It is one of the most dreaded parts of learning a foreign language, with English being no exception. In this paper, the role of Macedonian as the learners’ L1 and its influence on the understanding of different meanings of polysemous nouns will be examined. The study described in this thesis was conducted to test the hypothesis that learners will transfer some meanings from their L1 into English and distinguish between metonymical and metaphorical extensions of meaning which could affect the acquisition differently. Given that the study was based on another study dealing with a very similar topic, the nouns selected for the instrument were mostly taken from that study, which deals with polysemous nouns in English and Turkish. Some specific examples for Macedonian were added to the study for accuracy reasons. In the aforementioned study, the author Meral Ozturk (2018) tests each word twice: in its core sense and in its extended sense. This approach was adopted for the study at hand, along with the methodology for testing the data. The main criterion for selecting vocabulary for the instrument was that the words had to be familiar to the participants, as the aim was to test if they could discern core and extended meanings of the words with which they should already be familiar, and not to choose the ones the learners are unacquainted with. The first part of the paper deals with the theoretical background and explains the different aspects of polysemy as the main focus of the paper, as well as the difference between polysemy and homonymy. This lays the foundation for data processing in the discussion part of the thesis. The second part of the paper presents the study itself, its aims, and the means through which it was conducted. After that, there is a discussion about the results of the study and the main conclusions are drawn.

Publication Details

Journal
Goce Delchev University Repository (Goce Delčev University of Štip)
Published
2025-05-23
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of L1 in EFL Learners’ meaning construal of polysemous nouns

Goce Delchev University Repository (Goce Delčev University of Štip)
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

The role of L1 in EFL Learners’ meaning construal of polysemous nouns

article en

Abstract

A learner of any foreign language has the arduous task of mastering the vocabulary of that particular language, especially if the person wants to reach a near-native level of proficiency. It is one of the most dreaded parts of learning a foreign language, with English being no exception. In this paper, the role of Macedonian as the learners’ L1 and its influence on the understanding of different meanings of polysemous nouns will be examined. The study described in this thesis was conducted to test the hypothesis that learners will transfer some meanings from their L1 into English and distinguish between metonymical and metaphorical extensions of meaning which could affect the acquisition differently. Given that the study was based on another study dealing with a very similar topic, the nouns selected for the instrument were mostly taken from that study, which deals with polysemous nouns in English and Turkish. Some specific examples for Macedonian were added to the study for accuracy reasons. In the aforementioned study, the author Meral Ozturk (2018) tests each word twice: in its core sense and in its extended sense. This approach was adopted for the study at hand, along with the methodology for testing the data. The main criterion for selecting vocabulary for the instrument was that the words had to be familiar to the participants, as the aim was to test if they could discern core and extended meanings of the words with which they should already be familiar, and not to choose the ones the learners are unacquainted with. The first part of the paper deals with the theoretical background and explains the different aspects of polysemy as the main focus of the paper, as well as the difference between polysemy and homonymy. This lays the foundation for data processing in the discussion part of the thesis. The second part of the paper presents the study itself, its aims, and the means through which it was conducted. After that, there is a discussion about the results of the study and the main conclusions are drawn.

Goce Delchev University Repository (Goce Delčev University of Štip)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.