Punishment in America: Innovation, Continuity, Recycling, and Technological Transformations

This chapter examines the historical transformations and contemporary uses of three groups of punishments: non-custodial sanctions, imprisonment, and the death penalty. It begins with a contemporary overview of mass incarceration but crosses different centuries and regions to argue that punishment in the United States is a complex repertoire of innovation, continuity, recycling, and technological transformation. It highlights the competing aims of criminal punishment: deterrence, shaming, maintaining community cohesion and removing disruptors, effecting individual reform, repentance, or rehabilitation, and protecting the public, as well as revenge, repression, and incapacitation. It notes the many contextual factors that explain the prominence of specific aims in a particular time-period: the passage of new laws or legal repeals, conquest, locality, region, religion, labor needs, race, class, gender, attitudes toward sex, immigration, nativism, xenophobia, specific group profiling or targeting, political rhetoric, policymaking, and war. It acknowledges key twentieth-century themes such as greater reliance on social science expertise, the federalization of sentencing standards, standardization of punishment methods and prison regimes, and greater intervention by appellate courts and the United States' Supreme Court in internal prison governance and matters of human and civil rights, in contrast to a pre-1960s judicial “hands-off” stance.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Published
2024-12-26
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Punishment in America: Innovation, Continuity, Recycling, and Technological Transformations

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Punishment in America: Innovation, Continuity, Recycling, and Technological Transformations

article en

Abstract

This chapter examines the historical transformations and contemporary uses of three groups of punishments: non-custodial sanctions, imprisonment, and the death penalty. It begins with a contemporary overview of mass incarceration but crosses different centuries and regions to argue that punishment in the United States is a complex repertoire of innovation, continuity, recycling, and technological transformation. It highlights the competing aims of criminal punishment: deterrence, shaming, maintaining community cohesion and removing disruptors, effecting individual reform, repentance, or rehabilitation, and protecting the public, as well as revenge, repression, and incapacitation. It notes the many contextual factors that explain the prominence of specific aims in a particular time-period: the passage of new laws or legal repeals, conquest, locality, region, religion, labor needs, race, class, gender, attitudes toward sex, immigration, nativism, xenophobia, specific group profiling or targeting, political rhetoric, policymaking, and war. It acknowledges key twentieth-century themes such as greater reliance on social science expertise, the federalization of sentencing standards, standardization of punishment methods and prison regimes, and greater intervention by appellate courts and the United States' Supreme Court in internal prison governance and matters of human and civil rights, in contrast to a pre-1960s judicial “hands-off” stance.

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Punishment in America: Innovation, Continuity, Recycling, and Technological Transformations · Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS