A Qualitative Case Study into Faculty Use of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in Higher Education for Students with Disabilities

This multiple-bounded collective case study used an online questionnaire, rating scale, and semi-structured interviews to examine faculty use of Universal Design for Learning (UDL). Participants were comprised of seventeen faculty members from two- and four-year public and private universities within the United States. Each participant reported using UDL in three or more online courses where they had control over course content and instruction. All data collection focused on three research questions, which explored faculty knowledge of UDL, what UDL strategies they used for online learning, and any barriers to implementation. Thematic analysis was used to extract the major themes from triangulated data. The first theme was to create inclusive college courses through UDL training. The second theme was for faculty to use UDL guidelines and checkpoints appropriate for their course(s). Lastly, there was a need for campus support to aid in UDL implementation. The results from this study also highlighted that extensive training was not needed for faculty to incorporate components of UDL into their course content.

Publication Details

Journal
ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Qualitative Case Study into Faculty Use of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in Higher Education for Students with Disabilities

ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)
Disability Education and Employment
article

A Qualitative Case Study into Faculty Use of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in Higher Education for Students with Disabilities

article en

Abstract

This multiple-bounded collective case study used an online questionnaire, rating scale, and semi-structured interviews to examine faculty use of Universal Design for Learning (UDL). Participants were comprised of seventeen faculty members from two- and four-year public and private universities within the United States. Each participant reported using UDL in three or more online courses where they had control over course content and instruction. All data collection focused on three research questions, which explored faculty knowledge of UDL, what UDL strategies they used for online learning, and any barriers to implementation. Thematic analysis was used to extract the major themes from triangulated data. The first theme was to create inclusive college courses through UDL training. The second theme was for faculty to use UDL guidelines and checkpoints appropriate for their course(s). Lastly, there was a need for campus support to aid in UDL implementation. The results from this study also highlighted that extensive training was not needed for faculty to incorporate components of UDL into their course content.

ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Disability Education and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Qualitative Case Study into Faculty Use of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in Higher Education for Students with Disabilities · ThinkTech (Texas Tech University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS