Racial disparities in domestic violence: Analyzing the Intersection of race and gender

This research explores the intersection of race, gender, and the litigation of domestic violence cases in Memphis, Tennessee. This is explored through qualitative research that combines a theoretical framework with structured interviews of criminal defense attorneys. Utilizing a sample of 5 attorneys with recent exposure to domestic violence cases, this study aims to reveal whether or not intimate partner violence is litigated differently across racial lines. This is done through analysis of the treatment of victims depending on race, sentencing rates, and perceptions of credibility within the justice system. The methodology involves five key steps: conducting a literature review to establish theoretical frameworks, scheduling and conducting structured interviews, compression and sorting of the information found, and culminating in a comprehensive analysis of the findings. The diverse demographic makeup of Memphis allows for an in-depth analysis of how race and gender intersect in legal proceedings. Though White Americans are the overwhelming majority in the country, the city of Memphis is comprised of a 64% African American population and a 24% White population (U.S. Census Bureau, 2023). This provides a unique context for this investigation. Questions posed to participants explore perceptions of attorney’s opinions regarding judicial equity, the influence of state and federal laws, and the impact of racial biases on the litigation process. Additionally, the study investigates disparities in legal representation and support services for victims. By analyzing attorney narratives, this research seeks to reveal if racial, systemic issues are prevalent in domestic violence litigation.