Open Banking Framework, A Comparative Study of Evolving Law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and The United States of America

Open banking is reshaping the financial sector by enabling third-party access to consumer financial data and; fostering innovation while raising regulatory challenges. This study compares the legal frameworks that governs open banking in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and the United States (US), focusing on consumer protection, data privacy, and compliance. KSA adopts a centralized regulatory model under the Saudi Central Bank (SAMA), ensuring uniform compliance, while the US follows a fragmented, market-driven approach with multiple regulators. Through a comparative legal analysis, the study identifies key differences, regulatory gaps, and areas for improvement in transparency, dispute resolution, and responsible data-sharing practices. The findings of this dissertation highlight the need for balanced regulatory frameworks that promote financial innovation while safeguarding consumer rights. This research provides insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders that; advocate for legal reforms that enhance security, efficiency, and consumer trust in open banking ecosystems.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open Banking Framework, A Comparative Study of Evolving Law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and The United States of America

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Open Banking Framework, A Comparative Study of Evolving Law in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and The United States of America

article en

Abstract

Open banking is reshaping the financial sector by enabling third-party access to consumer financial data and; fostering innovation while raising regulatory challenges. This study compares the legal frameworks that governs open banking in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and the United States (US), focusing on consumer protection, data privacy, and compliance. KSA adopts a centralized regulatory model under the Saudi Central Bank (SAMA), ensuring uniform compliance, while the US follows a fragmented, market-driven approach with multiple regulators. Through a comparative legal analysis, the study identifies key differences, regulatory gaps, and areas for improvement in transparency, dispute resolution, and responsible data-sharing practices. The findings of this dissertation highlight the need for balanced regulatory frameworks that promote financial innovation while safeguarding consumer rights. This research provides insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders that; advocate for legal reforms that enhance security, efficiency, and consumer trust in open banking ecosystems.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.