Dirty Water

There are tens of thousands of unregulated industrial substances manufactured and used in the United States. This Article focuses on three specific to plastic and its manufacturing process: microplastics, phthalates, and BPAs. These substances have been attributed to many known health harms and potentially more that have yet to be identified. The research is still nascent and continues to evolve, but what we do know is who is creating the problem. From big oil companies and plastics manufacturers, to creators of textiles and tires, to investors who all contribute to the problem, how can we hold these accountable for the problems they cause? Existing regulations do not encompass much, with federal agencies less able to act due to Congress and the courts. One path that could hold manufacturers accountable for products that raise public health red flags is through Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). This process places the burden on manufacturers to take responsibility for their products at all stages of the product’s life cycle. Public health litigation (PHL) can deter manufacturers by holding them accountable for health harms. Extended Producer Responsibility and Public Health Litigation can work together: once EPR laws and standards are in the books, plaintiffs can use PHL to further their efforts by ensuring manufacturers are following the rules. This abstract has been taken from the authors' introduction.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dirty Water

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
article

Dirty Water

article en

Abstract

There are tens of thousands of unregulated industrial substances manufactured and used in the United States. This Article focuses on three specific to plastic and its manufacturing process: microplastics, phthalates, and BPAs. These substances have been attributed to many known health harms and potentially more that have yet to be identified. The research is still nascent and continues to evolve, but what we do know is who is creating the problem. From big oil companies and plastics manufacturers, to creators of textiles and tires, to investors who all contribute to the problem, how can we hold these accountable for the problems they cause? Existing regulations do not encompass much, with federal agencies less able to act due to Congress and the courts. One path that could hold manufacturers accountable for products that raise public health red flags is through Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). This process places the burden on manufacturers to take responsibility for their products at all stages of the product’s life cycle. Public health litigation (PHL) can deter manufacturers by holding them accountable for health harms. Extended Producer Responsibility and Public Health Litigation can work together: once EPR laws and standards are in the books, plaintiffs can use PHL to further their efforts by ensuring manufacturers are following the rules. This abstract has been taken from the authors' introduction.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.