No Joke: Refusal Policies for Cross-Cultural Sensitivity

This study investigates how AI language models enforce refusal policies in cross-cultural humor involving colonial histories. Through systematic testing of seven colonial pairs (e.g., Germany-Namibia, France-Algeria), this paper analyzes ChatGPT’s selective engagement with sensitive narratives. Findings reveal inconsistent refusal rates: prompts concerning Germany’s colonial past face the highest restrictions, followed by British and French contexts, while Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch colonial pairs encounter minimal refusals. Bulk requests and U.S.-related jokes activate additional safeguards, highlighting policy biases. By shifting attention from output bias to refusal patterns, this study demonstrates how ostensibly neutral safety mechanisms can reinforce digital colonialism by privileging dominant historical narratives and silencing marginalized perspectives. It also introduces refusal analysis as a novel metric for cross-cultural sensitivity in AI and underscores the urgency of culturally informed safety frameworks to mitigate systemic inequities in global discourse.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Economic and Industrial Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No Joke: Refusal Policies for Cross-Cultural Sensitivity

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Economic and Industrial Development
article

No Joke: Refusal Policies for Cross-Cultural Sensitivity

article en

Abstract

This study investigates how AI language models enforce refusal policies in cross-cultural humor involving colonial histories. Through systematic testing of seven colonial pairs (e.g., Germany-Namibia, France-Algeria), this paper analyzes ChatGPT’s selective engagement with sensitive narratives. Findings reveal inconsistent refusal rates: prompts concerning Germany’s colonial past face the highest restrictions, followed by British and French contexts, while Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch colonial pairs encounter minimal refusals. Bulk requests and U.S.-related jokes activate additional safeguards, highlighting policy biases. By shifting attention from output bias to refusal patterns, this study demonstrates how ostensibly neutral safety mechanisms can reinforce digital colonialism by privileging dominant historical narratives and silencing marginalized perspectives. It also introduces refusal analysis as a novel metric for cross-cultural sensitivity in AI and underscores the urgency of culturally informed safety frameworks to mitigate systemic inequities in global discourse.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Economic and Industrial Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

No Joke: Refusal Policies for Cross-Cultural Sensitivity · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS