More than just a grade: Factors influencing secondary students’ engagement with digital feedback

The increasing use of technology in secondary education has shifted teacher feedback practices to digital environments. While digital feedback offers many promising affordances, the factors that influence how students engage with and use digital feedback are not well understood. Previous research indicates that digital feedback poses unique challenges for engagement. New paradigm feedback models seek to identify processes and actions that promote feedback engagement. However, these models require further study in digital and pre-higher education contexts. This qualitative single-case study investigated the factors influencing secondary students' engagement with digital feedback. Data included 24 student interviews conducted across four grade levels (9th through 12th grade) and multiple content areas. Thematic analysis revealed that students' grade orientation influenced how they conceptualize, decode, and value feedback. The establishment and use of feedback routines, including providing opportunities to engage in dialogic interactions, emerged as a key factor influencing feedback engagement. Finally, several social-affective factors, such as student-teacher rapport, emotional responses to feedback, and peer support, were significant in mediating feedback engagement. Implications for classroom practice include recommendations for designing dialogic feedback routines that precede the final evaluation of student work. These recommendations emphasize the importance of establishing structured feedback processes that support meaningful student-teacher dialogue and engagement.

Publication Details

Journal
DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University)
Published
2024-12-12
Primary Topic
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More than just a grade: Factors influencing secondary students’ engagement with digital feedback

DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University)
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
article

More than just a grade: Factors influencing secondary students’ engagement with digital feedback

article en

Abstract

The increasing use of technology in secondary education has shifted teacher feedback practices to digital environments. While digital feedback offers many promising affordances, the factors that influence how students engage with and use digital feedback are not well understood. Previous research indicates that digital feedback poses unique challenges for engagement. New paradigm feedback models seek to identify processes and actions that promote feedback engagement. However, these models require further study in digital and pre-higher education contexts. This qualitative single-case study investigated the factors influencing secondary students' engagement with digital feedback. Data included 24 student interviews conducted across four grade levels (9th through 12th grade) and multiple content areas. Thematic analysis revealed that students' grade orientation influenced how they conceptualize, decode, and value feedback. The establishment and use of feedback routines, including providing opportunities to engage in dialogic interactions, emerged as a key factor influencing feedback engagement. Finally, several social-affective factors, such as student-teacher rapport, emotional responses to feedback, and peer support, were significant in mediating feedback engagement. Implications for classroom practice include recommendations for designing dialogic feedback routines that precede the final evaluation of student work. These recommendations emphasize the importance of establishing structured feedback processes that support meaningful student-teacher dialogue and engagement.

DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.