Knowledge, Attitude, and Belief of Healthcare Professionals Toward Obesity Stigmatization

Hongmei Lang,1,&ast; Xingping Zhang,1,&ast; Na Yan,1 Juan Du,1 Xiaoyan Jiang2 1Department of General Medicine, Chengdu Second People’s Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610021, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, 400014, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Hongmei Lang, Department of General Medicine, Chengdu Second People’s Hospital, No. 10 Qingyun South Street, Jinjiang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610021, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +86-18040368202, Email [email protected] Xiaoyan Jiang, Email [email protected]: Obesity stigmatization, defined as the social devaluation and denigration of individuals because of their excess weight, represents a significant barrier to effective healthcare delivery. This study aimed to investigate healthcare professionals’ knowledge about obesity-related health impacts, attitudes regarding weight bias (negative or discriminatory attitudes toward individuals with obesity), and beliefs about the causes and nature of obesity.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare professionals between Jan, 2024 and Feb, 2024 in The Department of General Medicine, Chengdu Second People’s Hospital, using a self-designed questionnaire.Results: A total of 388 valid questionnaires [303 (78.09%) female and a mean age of 37.71 ± 8.46 years] were included. The mean scores for knowledge, attitude, and belief were 6.70 ± 1.46 (possible range: 0– 10), 38.41 ± 5.09 (possible range: 8– 48), and 63.53 ± 15.35 (possible range: 0– 120), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that having body mass index ≥ 24.0 kg/m² (OR = 0.537, 95% CI: 0.331– 0.873, P = 0.012) and nurse profession (OR = 0.546, 95% CI: 0.338– 0.883, P = 0.014) were independently associated with knowledge. Knowledge (OR = 0.754, 95% CI: 0.600– 0.949, P = 0.016), belief (OR = 0.915, 95% CI: 0.854– 0.980, P = 0.011), and age (OR = 0.950, 95% CI: 0.906– 0.995, P = 0.031) were independently associated with attitude. Moreover, structural equation modeling showed that knowledge had a significant direct effect on both belief (β = 0.845, P < 0.001) and attitude (β = − 0.944, P < 0.001), as well as belief on attitude (β = − 0.550, P < 0.001).Conclusion: Healthcare professionals exhibited insufficient knowledge, negative attitude and belief toward obesity stigmatization. A pressing necessity arises for the implementation of targeted educational interventions and awareness programs within healthcare settings.Keywords: knowledge, belief, attitude, healthcare professional, obesity stigmatization, cross-sectional study

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge, Attitude, and Belief of Healthcare Professionals Toward Obesity Stigmatization

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
article

Knowledge, Attitude, and Belief of Healthcare Professionals Toward Obesity Stigmatization

article en

Abstract

Hongmei Lang,1,&ast; Xingping Zhang,1,&ast; Na Yan,1 Juan Du,1 Xiaoyan Jiang2 1Department of General Medicine, Chengdu Second People’s Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610021, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, 400014, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Hongmei Lang, Department of General Medicine, Chengdu Second People’s Hospital, No. 10 Qingyun South Street, Jinjiang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610021, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +86-18040368202, Email [email protected] Xiaoyan Jiang, Email [email protected]: Obesity stigmatization, defined as the social devaluation and denigration of individuals because of their excess weight, represents a significant barrier to effective healthcare delivery. This study aimed to investigate healthcare professionals’ knowledge about obesity-related health impacts, attitudes regarding weight bias (negative or discriminatory attitudes toward individuals with obesity), and beliefs about the causes and nature of obesity.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare professionals between Jan, 2024 and Feb, 2024 in The Department of General Medicine, Chengdu Second People’s Hospital, using a self-designed questionnaire.Results: A total of 388 valid questionnaires [303 (78.09%) female and a mean age of 37.71 ± 8.46 years] were included. The mean scores for knowledge, attitude, and belief were 6.70 ± 1.46 (possible range: 0– 10), 38.41 ± 5.09 (possible range: 8– 48), and 63.53 ± 15.35 (possible range: 0– 120), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that having body mass index ≥ 24.0 kg/m² (OR = 0.537, 95% CI: 0.331– 0.873, P = 0.012) and nurse profession (OR = 0.546, 95% CI: 0.338– 0.883, P = 0.014) were independently associated with knowledge. Knowledge (OR = 0.754, 95% CI: 0.600– 0.949, P = 0.016), belief (OR = 0.915, 95% CI: 0.854– 0.980, P = 0.011), and age (OR = 0.950, 95% CI: 0.906– 0.995, P = 0.031) were independently associated with attitude. Moreover, structural equation modeling showed that knowledge had a significant direct effect on both belief (β = 0.845, P < 0.001) and attitude (β = − 0.944, P < 0.001), as well as belief on attitude (β = − 0.550, P < 0.001).Conclusion: Healthcare professionals exhibited insufficient knowledge, negative attitude and belief toward obesity stigmatization. A pressing necessity arises for the implementation of targeted educational interventions and awareness programs within healthcare settings.Keywords: knowledge, belief, attitude, healthcare professional, obesity stigmatization, cross-sectional study

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.