Intramyocardial Hemorrhage in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Without Reperfusion Therapy: A Prospective Study

Muzheng Li,1 Zhijian Wu,2 Ilyas Tudahun,3 Kun Zhang1 1Department of Cardiology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Cardiology, Changsha Third People’s Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Kun Zhang, Department of Cardiology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected] and Aims: IMH commonly presents in STEMI patients receiving reperfusion therapy and is considered as an ischemic reperfusion injury. However, it is unclear whether IMH occurs in AMI patients without reperfusion therapy.Methods and Results: We prospectively enrolled 40 patients with STEMI and 41 patients with NSTEMI admitted to the CCU of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from April 2020 to November 2021, all of whom did not receive reperfusion therapy. In the STEMI group, 16 patients were detected with IMH by CMR. However, in the NSTEMI group, only 3 patients were detected. The incidence of IMH was significantly higher in patients with STEMI than NSTEMI (16/40 vs 3/41, P < 0.001). Among patients with STEMI, the incidence of IMH was not significantly different between patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention and those who did not (16/40 vs 27/65, P = 0.876). Patients in the spontaneous reperfusion group had a higher incidence of IMH than patients in the non-spontaneous reperfusion group (11/23 vs 5/17, P = 0.240). Similarly, in patients with STEMI who did not receive reperfusion therapy, the incidence of MACE was higher in the IMH-present group than in the IMH-absent group (5/16 vs 2/24, P = 0.063).Conclusion: The incidence of IMH is comparable in patients with STEMI with or without reperfusion therapy, but considerably higher than that in NSTEMI patients. Patients with STEMI can present with IMH even when infarct-related vessel flow is not restored.Keywords: myocardial infarction, intramyocardial hemorrhage, outcome, reperfusion therapy

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
Primary Topic
Textile materials and evaluations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intramyocardial Hemorrhage in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Without Reperfusion Therapy: A Prospective Study

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Textile materials and evaluations
article

Intramyocardial Hemorrhage in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Without Reperfusion Therapy: A Prospective Study

article en

Abstract

Muzheng Li,1 Zhijian Wu,2 Ilyas Tudahun,3 Kun Zhang1 1Department of Cardiology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Cardiology, Changsha Third People’s Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Kun Zhang, Department of Cardiology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected] and Aims: IMH commonly presents in STEMI patients receiving reperfusion therapy and is considered as an ischemic reperfusion injury. However, it is unclear whether IMH occurs in AMI patients without reperfusion therapy.Methods and Results: We prospectively enrolled 40 patients with STEMI and 41 patients with NSTEMI admitted to the CCU of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from April 2020 to November 2021, all of whom did not receive reperfusion therapy. In the STEMI group, 16 patients were detected with IMH by CMR. However, in the NSTEMI group, only 3 patients were detected. The incidence of IMH was significantly higher in patients with STEMI than NSTEMI (16/40 vs 3/41, P < 0.001). Among patients with STEMI, the incidence of IMH was not significantly different between patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention and those who did not (16/40 vs 27/65, P = 0.876). Patients in the spontaneous reperfusion group had a higher incidence of IMH than patients in the non-spontaneous reperfusion group (11/23 vs 5/17, P = 0.240). Similarly, in patients with STEMI who did not receive reperfusion therapy, the incidence of MACE was higher in the IMH-present group than in the IMH-absent group (5/16 vs 2/24, P = 0.063).Conclusion: The incidence of IMH is comparable in patients with STEMI with or without reperfusion therapy, but considerably higher than that in NSTEMI patients. Patients with STEMI can present with IMH even when infarct-related vessel flow is not restored.Keywords: myocardial infarction, intramyocardial hemorrhage, outcome, reperfusion therapy

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Textile materials and evaluations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.