Inter-instrument variability of Vaisala CL61 lidar-ceilometer's attenuated backscatter, cloud properties and mixed-layer height

Characterising inter-instrument variability of sensors is crucial to assessing uncertainties in observational campaigns, networks, and for data assimilation. Here, we co-locate six high signal-to-noise ratio Vaisala CL61 lidar-ceilometers for a period of ten days to quantify instrument-related differences in several observed variables: profiles of attenuated backscatter, its components (parallel- and crosspolarised backscatter) and the volume linear depolarisation ratio (δ), as well as derived cloud variables and mixed-layer height. Analysing intervals between 5-60 min, median absolute differences between sensors (AD50) and percentiles (e.g. AD75) are used to quantify instrument related uncertainties. For backscatter and δ, we differentiate between conditions with rain, clear sky, and clouds. Here we address instrument precision rather than accuracy, with instrument accuracy assumed. The detected agreement between instruments suggests a distributed measurement network should be capable of providing context for interpretation of spatial differences. If instruments measure accurately, it is possible to resolve spatial differences (e.g. urban-rural) for attenuated backscatter, derived cloud variables and layer heights. However, differences exist and vary with signal-to-noise ratio and atmospheric conditions. The AD50 intersensor results for 15 min intervals for total cloud-cover fraction (excluding clear sky and fully overcast conditions) is 1.9 %, and for cloud base height 7.3 m. Agreement of all cloud variables is better for boundary layer clouds (when first cloud layer < 4 km agl) than for all five cloud layers recorded by the sensor firmware. The 15 min mixed-layer height AD50 is 0 m and the AD75 21.5 m. We show that instrument precipitation flags are in good agreement, but do not link closely with ground-level rainfall observations, hence an alternative algorithm is proposed. We provide quality control recommendations for data processing to improve inter-instrument agreement of cloud variables and mixed-layer height.

Publication Details

Journal
CentAUR (University of Reading)
Published
2025-07-30
Primary Topic
Financial Literacy and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inter-instrument variability of Vaisala CL61 lidar-ceilometer's attenuated backscatter, cloud properties and mixed-layer height

CentAUR (University of Reading)
Financial Literacy and Behavior
article

Inter-instrument variability of Vaisala CL61 lidar-ceilometer's attenuated backscatter, cloud properties and mixed-layer height

article en

Abstract

Characterising inter-instrument variability of sensors is crucial to assessing uncertainties in observational campaigns, networks, and for data assimilation. Here, we co-locate six high signal-to-noise ratio Vaisala CL61 lidar-ceilometers for a period of ten days to quantify instrument-related differences in several observed variables: profiles of attenuated backscatter, its components (parallel- and crosspolarised backscatter) and the volume linear depolarisation ratio (δ), as well as derived cloud variables and mixed-layer height. Analysing intervals between 5-60 min, median absolute differences between sensors (AD50) and percentiles (e.g. AD75) are used to quantify instrument related uncertainties. For backscatter and δ, we differentiate between conditions with rain, clear sky, and clouds. Here we address instrument precision rather than accuracy, with instrument accuracy assumed. The detected agreement between instruments suggests a distributed measurement network should be capable of providing context for interpretation of spatial differences. If instruments measure accurately, it is possible to resolve spatial differences (e.g. urban-rural) for attenuated backscatter, derived cloud variables and layer heights. However, differences exist and vary with signal-to-noise ratio and atmospheric conditions. The AD50 intersensor results for 15 min intervals for total cloud-cover fraction (excluding clear sky and fully overcast conditions) is 1.9 %, and for cloud base height 7.3 m. Agreement of all cloud variables is better for boundary layer clouds (when first cloud layer < 4 km agl) than for all five cloud layers recorded by the sensor firmware. The 15 min mixed-layer height AD50 is 0 m and the AD75 21.5 m. We show that instrument precipitation flags are in good agreement, but do not link closely with ground-level rainfall observations, hence an alternative algorithm is proposed. We provide quality control recommendations for data processing to improve inter-instrument agreement of cloud variables and mixed-layer height.

CentAUR (University of Reading)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Financial Literacy and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Inter-instrument variability of Vaisala CL61 lidar-ceilometer's attenuated backscatter, cloud properties and mixed-layer height · CentAUR (University of Reading) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS