The Impact of AI Ethicality on Clinical Decision-making: The Role of AI Trustworthiness and Representativeness

There are critical ethical concerns about using artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare. Healthcare professionals are more likely to adopt AI if they believe in its capability and perceive alignment in clinical decisions with ethical principles. Although previous studies have shown ethical issues in clinical decision making, empirical research investigating how AI ethicality influences healthcare professionals’ perceptions of AI performance expectancy remains limited. Drawing on integrated ethical decision making, we propose a research model to examine the effects of AI ethicality and AI trustworthiness on healthcare professionals’ perceptions of AI performance expectancy. Moreover, we explore whether AI representativeness in adhering to EDI (equity, diversity, inclusion) strengthens the impact of AI ethicality on AI performance expectancy. A vignette-based methodology is proposed to test the model using data collected from healthcare professionals. This research aims to contribute to the literature by providing empirical evidence on how ethical and representative AI systems shape healthcare professionals’ expectations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of AI Ethicality on Clinical Decision-making: The Role of AI Trustworthiness and Representativeness

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

The Impact of AI Ethicality on Clinical Decision-making: The Role of AI Trustworthiness and Representativeness

article en

Abstract

There are critical ethical concerns about using artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare. Healthcare professionals are more likely to adopt AI if they believe in its capability and perceive alignment in clinical decisions with ethical principles. Although previous studies have shown ethical issues in clinical decision making, empirical research investigating how AI ethicality influences healthcare professionals’ perceptions of AI performance expectancy remains limited. Drawing on integrated ethical decision making, we propose a research model to examine the effects of AI ethicality and AI trustworthiness on healthcare professionals’ perceptions of AI performance expectancy. Moreover, we explore whether AI representativeness in adhering to EDI (equity, diversity, inclusion) strengthens the impact of AI ethicality on AI performance expectancy. A vignette-based methodology is proposed to test the model using data collected from healthcare professionals. This research aims to contribute to the literature by providing empirical evidence on how ethical and representative AI systems shape healthcare professionals’ expectations.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
University of Manitoba (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Impact of AI Ethicality on Clinical Decision-making: The Role of AI Trustworthiness and Representativeness · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS