Heterogeneous assemblages of care and their normativities

We explore shifting care relations and compromises taking place as part of introducing welfare technologies in various home care contexts. Through cases and stories involving three different empirical settings and users, we discuss the adoption of welfare technology and how this is fitted and added to different care contexts. The first case is the various uses of eating robotics in a care home and in a day care center for a man living with cerebral palsy. The second case is the use of medicine dispensers in municipal home nursing services for old persons with cognitive impairment at different sites in Sweden and Norway. We debate how different normativities in terms of care context and care situation involve constant shifts and crash of normativities. We elucidate shifting relations and care needs and demands emerging as an effect of different specificities deriving from the care environment. To do this we apply analytical concepts from STS such as normativities of care, assemblage, tinkering and compromise. The contribution of this chapter to the edited volume is the following: First, throughout welfare technology implementation, there are several normativities at play that shifts and transform dependent on how the adoption goes. Second, to sustain assemblages of good care, a lot of footwork is needed, for example when the technology is moved from one context to another and/or when new actors/care providers are involved. Third, the analytical resources from STS, help us get a grasp of the mobilization of resources needed to sustain assemblages of good care.<br/><br/>Keywords: Assemblage, eating robot, medicine dispenser, normativities, compromises<br/>

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-26
Primary Topic
Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heterogeneous assemblages of care and their normativities

Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
article

Heterogeneous assemblages of care and their normativities

article en

Abstract

We explore shifting care relations and compromises taking place as part of introducing welfare technologies in various home care contexts. Through cases and stories involving three different empirical settings and users, we discuss the adoption of welfare technology and how this is fitted and added to different care contexts. The first case is the various uses of eating robotics in a care home and in a day care center for a man living with cerebral palsy. The second case is the use of medicine dispensers in municipal home nursing services for old persons with cognitive impairment at different sites in Sweden and Norway. We debate how different normativities in terms of care context and care situation involve constant shifts and crash of normativities. We elucidate shifting relations and care needs and demands emerging as an effect of different specificities deriving from the care environment. To do this we apply analytical concepts from STS such as normativities of care, assemblage, tinkering and compromise. The contribution of this chapter to the edited volume is the following: First, throughout welfare technology implementation, there are several normativities at play that shifts and transform dependent on how the adoption goes. Second, to sustain assemblages of good care, a lot of footwork is needed, for example when the technology is moved from one context to another and/or when new actors/care providers are involved. Third, the analytical resources from STS, help us get a grasp of the mobilization of resources needed to sustain assemblages of good care.<br/><br/>Keywords: Assemblage, eating robot, medicine dispenser, normativities, compromises<br/>

Danish Agriculture and Food Council (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.