Evaluation of Sum of Segments Biometry in Modern Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Long Eyes

Hany Ahmed Helaly,1 Karim Abdellatif Gaballah,2 Ahmed Mahmoud Ragab,1 Tamer Moussa Ibrahim1 1Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt; 2Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, EgyptCorrespondence: : Hany Ahmed Helaly, Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, 30 Roshdy Street, Roshdy, Alexandria, Egypt, Tel +201225466733, Email [email protected]: To evaluate the sum of segments (SOS) biometry in modern intraocular lens power (IOL) calculation formulas for long eyes.Methods: This was a retrospective case series that included 177 eyes from 177 patients with axial length (AL) ≥ 24.5 mm. Preoperative AL measurements were performed using the ARGOS (Alcon, Inc). This study used 2 formulas: the Barrett Universal II (BUII) and the Barrett true axial length (BTAL). Other formulas were included: Cooke K6, EVO 2.0, and PEARL DGS.Results: The Barrett Universal II formula exhibited the most significant myopic mean prediction error at − 0.15 ± 0.27 D, with the Cooke K6, PEARL-DGS, and EVO 2.0 formulas following. In terms of hyperopic mean prediction error, the PEARL-DGSsos formula recorded the highest value at 0.19 ± 0.32 D, succeeded by the EVO 2.0sos, Cooke K6sos, and BTAL formulas. The EVO 2.0, PEARL-DGS, Barrett Universal II, and Cooke K6 formulas demonstrated the lowest mean and median absolute errors, with BTAL, EVO 2.0sos, Cooke K6sos, and PEARL-DGSsos formulas trailing behind. The median absolute errors (MedAE) for EVO 2.0, PEARL-DGS, and Barrett Universal II were recorded at 0.13, 0.15, and 0.16 D, respectively.Conclusion: BUII formula showed myopic shift with SOS biometry which increases with longer eyes. Using SOS option in Cooke K6, EVO 2.0, and PEARL-DGS formulas leads to a hyperopic shift in the mean prediction error which is undesirable. Using ALsos in those formulas without choosing the option of SOS yields a mean prediction error towards the myopic side which might be more desirable. All included formulas performed well with ALsos with most of the cases within + 1 D of intended refraction.Keywords: biometry, sum of segments, ARGOS, long eyes, IOL power calculation

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
Primary Topic
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Sum of Segments Biometry in Modern Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Long Eyes

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
article

Evaluation of Sum of Segments Biometry in Modern Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Long Eyes

article en

Abstract

Hany Ahmed Helaly,1 Karim Abdellatif Gaballah,2 Ahmed Mahmoud Ragab,1 Tamer Moussa Ibrahim1 1Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt; 2Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, EgyptCorrespondence: : Hany Ahmed Helaly, Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, 30 Roshdy Street, Roshdy, Alexandria, Egypt, Tel +201225466733, Email [email protected]: To evaluate the sum of segments (SOS) biometry in modern intraocular lens power (IOL) calculation formulas for long eyes.Methods: This was a retrospective case series that included 177 eyes from 177 patients with axial length (AL) ≥ 24.5 mm. Preoperative AL measurements were performed using the ARGOS (Alcon, Inc). This study used 2 formulas: the Barrett Universal II (BUII) and the Barrett true axial length (BTAL). Other formulas were included: Cooke K6, EVO 2.0, and PEARL DGS.Results: The Barrett Universal II formula exhibited the most significant myopic mean prediction error at − 0.15 ± 0.27 D, with the Cooke K6, PEARL-DGS, and EVO 2.0 formulas following. In terms of hyperopic mean prediction error, the PEARL-DGSsos formula recorded the highest value at 0.19 ± 0.32 D, succeeded by the EVO 2.0sos, Cooke K6sos, and BTAL formulas. The EVO 2.0, PEARL-DGS, Barrett Universal II, and Cooke K6 formulas demonstrated the lowest mean and median absolute errors, with BTAL, EVO 2.0sos, Cooke K6sos, and PEARL-DGSsos formulas trailing behind. The median absolute errors (MedAE) for EVO 2.0, PEARL-DGS, and Barrett Universal II were recorded at 0.13, 0.15, and 0.16 D, respectively.Conclusion: BUII formula showed myopic shift with SOS biometry which increases with longer eyes. Using SOS option in Cooke K6, EVO 2.0, and PEARL-DGS formulas leads to a hyperopic shift in the mean prediction error which is undesirable. Using ALsos in those formulas without choosing the option of SOS yields a mean prediction error towards the myopic side which might be more desirable. All included formulas performed well with ALsos with most of the cases within + 1 D of intended refraction.Keywords: biometry, sum of segments, ARGOS, long eyes, IOL power calculation

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Sum of Segments Biometry in Modern Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Long Eyes · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS