Dimensions of vertical and horizontal information privacy concerns

Nowadays, the use of the internet is widespread, despite many people being concerned about their information privacy when using it. While the concept of information privacy concerns (IPCs) is central to understanding internet users’ perceptions about information privacy, it has come under criticism. On the one hand, it may not fully reflect the contemporary concerns of internet users. On the other hand, it is typically explored as a unitary concept, despite research showing that the distinction between vertical (institutional) and horizontal (social) IPCs is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of users’ concerns. The current study adopted an exploratory qualitative approach using focus groups to gain insights into individuals’ vertical and horizontal IPCs when using the internet. Thematic analysis of the discussions indicated that participants were concerned about many, but not all, issues identified in the literature on IPCs. Based on these findings, we proposed a revised definition of IPCs that extends previous conceptualizations by incorporating concerns about persistence, discrimination, and manipulation, while delineating the concepts of awareness and control. The analysis also showed that although participants thought about vertical and horizontal IPCs in similar terms, they were concerned due to different reasons. Vertical IPCs centered on surveillance and loss of freedom, while horizontal IPCs highlighted damages to identity and dignity. The study advances our knowledge of IPCs and shows that for a comprehensive understanding of contemporary users’ concerns we need to consider a wider range of information privacy issues than previously thought.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Published
2025-04-21
Primary Topic
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dimensions of vertical and horizontal information privacy concerns

Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
article

Dimensions of vertical and horizontal information privacy concerns

article en

Abstract

Nowadays, the use of the internet is widespread, despite many people being concerned about their information privacy when using it. While the concept of information privacy concerns (IPCs) is central to understanding internet users’ perceptions about information privacy, it has come under criticism. On the one hand, it may not fully reflect the contemporary concerns of internet users. On the other hand, it is typically explored as a unitary concept, despite research showing that the distinction between vertical (institutional) and horizontal (social) IPCs is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of users’ concerns. The current study adopted an exploratory qualitative approach using focus groups to gain insights into individuals’ vertical and horizontal IPCs when using the internet. Thematic analysis of the discussions indicated that participants were concerned about many, but not all, issues identified in the literature on IPCs. Based on these findings, we proposed a revised definition of IPCs that extends previous conceptualizations by incorporating concerns about persistence, discrimination, and manipulation, while delineating the concepts of awareness and control. The analysis also showed that although participants thought about vertical and horizontal IPCs in similar terms, they were concerned due to different reasons. Vertical IPCs centered on surveillance and loss of freedom, while horizontal IPCs highlighted damages to identity and dignity. The study advances our knowledge of IPCs and shows that for a comprehensive understanding of contemporary users’ concerns we need to consider a wider range of information privacy issues than previously thought.

Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dimensions of vertical and horizontal information privacy concerns · Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS