Considering the Child’s Wishes—But How? Allowing Children to Speak in Their Custody Matters

In the United States, states universally may consider the child’s wishes when determining their custody placement. While their decision or preference is not binding for the judge, it allows the child meaningful participation in decisions that directly affect them. There are many ways courts can ensure a child’s voice is heard: through an interview with the judge, professional evaluations, child advocates, and even child-inclusive mediation. Yet state laws give judges broad discretion when determining how to weigh the child’s wishes. This discretion will inevitably leave some children behind without having their voices heard. Allowing children meaningful participation in their custody proceedings is not a new idea but follows a more significant global trend. Not only does their input allow them more autonomy over their life and decisions, but it can also reduce the adverse psychological implications of being silenced, allow for a greater understanding of the facts and circumstances surrounding the case, and help diminish disparate impacts from judicial discretion. The Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act has been significantly influential in family law. Since all courts are obliged to consider the child’s wishes, amending the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act with stricter language requiring courts to give children the option to provide input will better ensure this factor is truly considered and given its due weight.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considering the Child’s Wishes—But How? Allowing Children to Speak in Their Custody Matters

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
article

Considering the Child’s Wishes—But How? Allowing Children to Speak in Their Custody Matters

article en

Abstract

In the United States, states universally may consider the child’s wishes when determining their custody placement. While their decision or preference is not binding for the judge, it allows the child meaningful participation in decisions that directly affect them. There are many ways courts can ensure a child’s voice is heard: through an interview with the judge, professional evaluations, child advocates, and even child-inclusive mediation. Yet state laws give judges broad discretion when determining how to weigh the child’s wishes. This discretion will inevitably leave some children behind without having their voices heard. Allowing children meaningful participation in their custody proceedings is not a new idea but follows a more significant global trend. Not only does their input allow them more autonomy over their life and decisions, but it can also reduce the adverse psychological implications of being silenced, allow for a greater understanding of the facts and circumstances surrounding the case, and help diminish disparate impacts from judicial discretion. The Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act has been significantly influential in family law. Since all courts are obliged to consider the child’s wishes, amending the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act with stricter language requiring courts to give children the option to provide input will better ensure this factor is truly considered and given its due weight.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.