Challenges and Impact: Federal Initiatives in Desegregating Rural Mississippi Schools during the Great Society

My research aims to better understand the federal government’s role in addressing educational disparities by studying the impact of two of LBJ’s Great Society policy programs, The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, on the desegregation of public schools in Rural Mississippi. It examines the state's resistance to integration from Brown v. Board of Education to the mid-1960s to analyze the structural factors that delayed integration and then moves into studying both the motives behind the policies and their implementation in Rural Mississippi. Ultimately, I found that the desegregation plans the federal government prescribed, many of which only called for “Freedom of Choice” or only desegregated two grades, were ineffective. Reasons for this include historical structural barriers, a lack of manpower in Washington, D.C. actually to enforce integration, and too much delegation of authority to the Mississippi State Office of Education. This resulted in the misallocation and misuse of millions of dollars that were intended to address rural poverty. While these Great Society programs began the process of desegregation in rural Mississippi schools after years of delays, which was no small feat, they were largely unsuccessful in achieving their goals, and educational disparities still dominate education in the state today.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Published
2024-10-01
Primary Topic
Military Technology and Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and Impact: Federal Initiatives in Desegregating Rural Mississippi Schools during the Great Society

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Military Technology and Strategies
article

Challenges and Impact: Federal Initiatives in Desegregating Rural Mississippi Schools during the Great Society

article en

Abstract

My research aims to better understand the federal government’s role in addressing educational disparities by studying the impact of two of LBJ’s Great Society policy programs, The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, on the desegregation of public schools in Rural Mississippi. It examines the state's resistance to integration from Brown v. Board of Education to the mid-1960s to analyze the structural factors that delayed integration and then moves into studying both the motives behind the policies and their implementation in Rural Mississippi. Ultimately, I found that the desegregation plans the federal government prescribed, many of which only called for “Freedom of Choice” or only desegregated two grades, were ineffective. Reasons for this include historical structural barriers, a lack of manpower in Washington, D.C. actually to enforce integration, and too much delegation of authority to the Mississippi State Office of Education. This resulted in the misallocation and misuse of millions of dollars that were intended to address rural poverty. While these Great Society programs began the process of desegregation in rural Mississippi schools after years of delays, which was no small feat, they were largely unsuccessful in achieving their goals, and educational disparities still dominate education in the state today.

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Military Technology and Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.