The Communication Theory of Argumentativeness: A Study Analyzing Argumentativeness and Demographics

Quantitative research regarding the communication theory of argumentativeness is presented. The communication theory of argumentativeness, with its established argumentativeness conceptualization, scale, and measure, is central. The argumentativeness conceptualization, scale, and measure are used to posit argumentativeness groupings, which are then analyzed along with demographics within argumentativeness groupings. The following research questions are posed and answered: What is the distribution of argumentativeness within the general population? Are there identifiable segments/groupings of argumentativeness within the general population? Are there certain demographic characteristics that accompany the argumentativeness groupings of low, middle, and high argumentativeness measures? The conclusion finds: there are identifiable argumentativeness groupings; the argumentativeness grouping of high argumentativeness is correlated with a parental status of with children, an educational status of college education, and a generational status of millennials; the argumentativeness grouping of low argumentativeness is correlated with an increase in age, a generational status of baby boomers, and an employment status of not seeking employment; descriptive trends in regard to argumentativeness and marriage and divorce are noted. The findings support the theory of argumentativeness’ assertion that argumentativeness is a positive communication behavior. Suggestions for further research include developing techniques for encouraging people to move toward optimal points along the argumentativeness distribution.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)
Published
2025-02-07
Primary Topic
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Communication Theory of Argumentativeness: A Study Analyzing Argumentativeness and Demographics

Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
article

The Communication Theory of Argumentativeness: A Study Analyzing Argumentativeness and Demographics

article en

Abstract

Quantitative research regarding the communication theory of argumentativeness is presented. The communication theory of argumentativeness, with its established argumentativeness conceptualization, scale, and measure, is central. The argumentativeness conceptualization, scale, and measure are used to posit argumentativeness groupings, which are then analyzed along with demographics within argumentativeness groupings. The following research questions are posed and answered: What is the distribution of argumentativeness within the general population? Are there identifiable segments/groupings of argumentativeness within the general population? Are there certain demographic characteristics that accompany the argumentativeness groupings of low, middle, and high argumentativeness measures? The conclusion finds: there are identifiable argumentativeness groupings; the argumentativeness grouping of high argumentativeness is correlated with a parental status of with children, an educational status of college education, and a generational status of millennials; the argumentativeness grouping of low argumentativeness is correlated with an increase in age, a generational status of baby boomers, and an employment status of not seeking employment; descriptive trends in regard to argumentativeness and marriage and divorce are noted. The findings support the theory of argumentativeness’ assertion that argumentativeness is a positive communication behavior. Suggestions for further research include developing techniques for encouraging people to move toward optimal points along the argumentativeness distribution.

Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.