Contesting the Rise of Artificial Intelligence: Collective Action Frames in Fields of Emerging Technologies

The concerns around the rapid rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) have sparked several social movements that address diverse AI-related issues, each articulating distinct frames to guide their collective actions. These frames are multiple and sometimes conflicting since AI, as an emerging technology, is equivocal and continuously changing. In this study, we investigate how AI-oriented social movements deploy frames to influence the different groups in the AI field. Through qualitative content analysis of 39 social movement organizations’ websites, we identified two key theoretical dimensions: the dominant task of the frame, distinguishing between problem elaboration (diagnosis) and solution formulation (prognosis), and the temporal orientation of the frame, distinguishing between those focused on present versus future AI impacts. These dimensions divide the frames into four major categories: harms, risks, remedial, and preventative frames. We argue that frames with distinct dominant tasks complement each other, while the temporal dimension creates tension between differing frames.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
Robotics and Automated Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contesting the Rise of Artificial Intelligence: Collective Action Frames in Fields of Emerging Technologies

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Robotics and Automated Systems
article

Contesting the Rise of Artificial Intelligence: Collective Action Frames in Fields of Emerging Technologies

article en

Abstract

The concerns around the rapid rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) have sparked several social movements that address diverse AI-related issues, each articulating distinct frames to guide their collective actions. These frames are multiple and sometimes conflicting since AI, as an emerging technology, is equivocal and continuously changing. In this study, we investigate how AI-oriented social movements deploy frames to influence the different groups in the AI field. Through qualitative content analysis of 39 social movement organizations’ websites, we identified two key theoretical dimensions: the dominant task of the frame, distinguishing between problem elaboration (diagnosis) and solution formulation (prognosis), and the temporal orientation of the frame, distinguishing between those focused on present versus future AI impacts. These dimensions divide the frames into four major categories: harms, risks, remedial, and preventative frames. We argue that frames with distinct dominant tasks complement each other, while the temporal dimension creates tension between differing frames.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Robotics and Automated Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.