Athlete Soreness Self-Reporting for Increased Sports Recovery

With 70-80% of athletes choosing to withhold soreness/injury-related information from sports staff (Jessiman-Perreault et al., 2016; Whatman et al., 2018), the need for more research in this sector of sports communication is apparent. This study aimed to take a step in closing that research gap by identifying barriers to soreness reporting and taking measures to try and work around those barriers in partnership with a Division I, southeastern, public university football team over the course of the 2024 season. The 2024 season’s data was then compared to data collected in the 2021-2023 seasons. Exploratory research into a Division I, southeastern, public University’s football team revealed that the athlete identity, warrior mentality, cognitive dissonance model, and health disclosure decision-making model were barriers to their players’ self-reporting soreness information. Soreness data collection was used to help training staff understand what is going on with their team members physically and help players understand what they need to focus on recovery-wise to be at their best potential. Using the exploratory research as a guide, this study looked to change existing soreness data collection strategies and implement a new soreness communication plan to increase soreness self- reporting and player-led recovery initiatives. Using individual interviews and observational data, results were collected on a weekly basis and compared with previous years. Results indicate that strategically designing communicative messages focused on increasing recovery modality use and normalizing soreness recovery practices led to an increase in soreness self-reporting by players and an increase in player-led recovery usage. Practical implications are forwarded.

Publication Details

Journal
TigerPrints (Clemson University)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Athlete Soreness Self-Reporting for Increased Sports Recovery

TigerPrints (Clemson University)
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
article

Athlete Soreness Self-Reporting for Increased Sports Recovery

article en

Abstract

With 70-80% of athletes choosing to withhold soreness/injury-related information from sports staff (Jessiman-Perreault et al., 2016; Whatman et al., 2018), the need for more research in this sector of sports communication is apparent. This study aimed to take a step in closing that research gap by identifying barriers to soreness reporting and taking measures to try and work around those barriers in partnership with a Division I, southeastern, public university football team over the course of the 2024 season. The 2024 season’s data was then compared to data collected in the 2021-2023 seasons. Exploratory research into a Division I, southeastern, public University’s football team revealed that the athlete identity, warrior mentality, cognitive dissonance model, and health disclosure decision-making model were barriers to their players’ self-reporting soreness information. Soreness data collection was used to help training staff understand what is going on with their team members physically and help players understand what they need to focus on recovery-wise to be at their best potential. Using the exploratory research as a guide, this study looked to change existing soreness data collection strategies and implement a new soreness communication plan to increase soreness self- reporting and player-led recovery initiatives. Using individual interviews and observational data, results were collected on a weekly basis and compared with previous years. Results indicate that strategically designing communicative messages focused on increasing recovery modality use and normalizing soreness recovery practices led to an increase in soreness self-reporting by players and an increase in player-led recovery usage. Practical implications are forwarded.

TigerPrints (Clemson University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.