As Punishment for Arrests: Involuntary Servitude Under the Housekeeping Exception to the Thirteenth Amendment

The Thirteenth Amendment reads: “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.” Yet, in contemporary American jails and prisons, pretrial detainees have been forced to perform work for these carceral facilities despite not being convicted of a crime. When tasked with assessing the constitutionality of such pre-conviction labor policies, courts employed a narrow reading of the Thirteenth Amendment and ruled that jails and prisons can compel pretrial detainees to perform maintenance and operational tasks under the judicially-created “housekeeping exception.” In this Note, the author delves into the historical development and courts’ modern applications of the housekeeping exception and analyzes how the exception undermines the purpose and text of the Thirteenth Amendment. The author then advocates for both judicial and legislative action to overturn or, alternatively, limit the housekeeping exception, thereby preventing further Thirteenth Amendment violations within the U.S. penal system.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-03-10
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

As Punishment for Arrests: Involuntary Servitude Under the Housekeeping Exception to the Thirteenth Amendment

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

As Punishment for Arrests: Involuntary Servitude Under the Housekeeping Exception to the Thirteenth Amendment

article en

Abstract

The Thirteenth Amendment reads: “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.” Yet, in contemporary American jails and prisons, pretrial detainees have been forced to perform work for these carceral facilities despite not being convicted of a crime. When tasked with assessing the constitutionality of such pre-conviction labor policies, courts employed a narrow reading of the Thirteenth Amendment and ruled that jails and prisons can compel pretrial detainees to perform maintenance and operational tasks under the judicially-created “housekeeping exception.” In this Note, the author delves into the historical development and courts’ modern applications of the housekeeping exception and analyzes how the exception undermines the purpose and text of the Thirteenth Amendment. The author then advocates for both judicial and legislative action to overturn or, alternatively, limit the housekeeping exception, thereby preventing further Thirteenth Amendment violations within the U.S. penal system.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

As Punishment for Arrests: Involuntary Servitude Under the Housekeeping Exception to the Thirteenth Amendment · eYLS (Yale Law School) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS