From Broadcast to Broadband: Policy Silences in the "Compromise and Consensus" of Industry Capture

Through a narrative policy framework (NPF) analysis, we compare official White House press releases from Bill Clinton’s 1996 Telecommunications Act, and Joe Biden’s 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). Our purpose is to identify similarities and differences in the way the two administrations, 25 years apart, addressed issues pertaining to telecommunication regulation. This analysis reveals major distinctions between how the acts were framed, specifically in terms of who was responsible for the policy problem being addressed. Most significant was the shift from clearly addressing media consolidation as a threat (in the 1996 Act), to avoiding any mention of the increasingly consolidated media industry (in 2021). We reflect on these distinctions through Des Freedman’s notion of ‘policy silences’—the omissions of policy discussions—as they relate to contradictions between normative democratic theory and the role of private interests in US policymaking.

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries)
Published
2025-04-29
Primary Topic
High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Broadcast to Broadband: Policy Silences in the "Compromise and Consensus" of Industry Capture

ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries)
High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
article

From Broadcast to Broadband: Policy Silences in the "Compromise and Consensus" of Industry Capture

article en

Abstract

Through a narrative policy framework (NPF) analysis, we compare official White House press releases from Bill Clinton’s 1996 Telecommunications Act, and Joe Biden’s 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). Our purpose is to identify similarities and differences in the way the two administrations, 25 years apart, addressed issues pertaining to telecommunication regulation. This analysis reveals major distinctions between how the acts were framed, specifically in terms of who was responsible for the policy problem being addressed. Most significant was the shift from clearly addressing media consolidation as a threat (in the 1996 Act), to avoiding any mention of the increasingly consolidated media industry (in 2021). We reflect on these distinctions through Des Freedman’s notion of ‘policy silences’—the omissions of policy discussions—as they relate to contradictions between normative democratic theory and the role of private interests in US policymaking.

ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.