Медіа як специфічний суб’єкт злочину закликів до геноциду

The article is dedicated to analyzing the role of media in committing the crime of incitement to genocide and the existing practice of holding individuals accountable for such actions. The study briefly examines the historical development of the concept of genocide, as defined in the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, and other international legal instruments. The article further analyzes legal precedents where incitement to genocide through media has been recognized as a separate crime independent of the actual commission of genocidal acts. Special attention is given to the practice of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), particularly the «media case», in which the RTLM radio station and the Kangura newspaper were deemed instruments that contributed to genocide. The authors examine both the nature of the statements that constituted incitement to genocide and the means of committing the crime (direct and public incitement). Another essential aspect discussed is the question of when the crime of incitement to genocide should be considered complete. A separate section of the study focuses on distinguishing between the concepts of «hate speech» and «incitement to genocide». It is established that while hate speech creates a favourable environment for genocide, only direct and public incitement to the physical destruction of a specific group can be qualified as a crime under international law. Representatives of mass media are a specific category of perpetrators in the crime of incitement to genocide. Media outlets provide a platform for disseminating information and ideas to large audiences, amplifying the impact of potential incitement to genocide. At the same time, journalists and media professionals benefit from certain legal privileges, making it more challenging to hold them accountable for particular statements. The authors also analyze modern challenges related to media use for fueling hatred and inciting crimes against humanity. Special attention is given to the activities of Russian media in covering the war against Ukraine, which, according to various human rights organizations and international experts, may fall under the classification of incitement to genocide. In conclusion, the article outlines prospects for further research in this field.

Publication Details

Journal
The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Published
2025-04-28
Primary Topic
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Медіа як специфічний суб’єкт злочину закликів до геноциду

The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
article

Медіа як специфічний суб’єкт злочину закликів до геноциду

article en

Abstract

The article is dedicated to analyzing the role of media in committing the crime of incitement to genocide and the existing practice of holding individuals accountable for such actions. The study briefly examines the historical development of the concept of genocide, as defined in the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, and other international legal instruments. The article further analyzes legal precedents where incitement to genocide through media has been recognized as a separate crime independent of the actual commission of genocidal acts. Special attention is given to the practice of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), particularly the «media case», in which the RTLM radio station and the Kangura newspaper were deemed instruments that contributed to genocide. The authors examine both the nature of the statements that constituted incitement to genocide and the means of committing the crime (direct and public incitement). Another essential aspect discussed is the question of when the crime of incitement to genocide should be considered complete. A separate section of the study focuses on distinguishing between the concepts of «hate speech» and «incitement to genocide». It is established that while hate speech creates a favourable environment for genocide, only direct and public incitement to the physical destruction of a specific group can be qualified as a crime under international law. Representatives of mass media are a specific category of perpetrators in the crime of incitement to genocide. Media outlets provide a platform for disseminating information and ideas to large audiences, amplifying the impact of potential incitement to genocide. At the same time, journalists and media professionals benefit from certain legal privileges, making it more challenging to hold them accountable for particular statements. The authors also analyze modern challenges related to media use for fueling hatred and inciting crimes against humanity. Special attention is given to the activities of Russian media in covering the war against Ukraine, which, according to various human rights organizations and international experts, may fall under the classification of incitement to genocide. In conclusion, the article outlines prospects for further research in this field.

The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.