A Sleeping Giant: Late HBV Reactivation After Rituximab-Based Chemotherapy Despite Correct Prophylaxis

Anna A Nowicka,1– 3 Anna Szymanek-Pasternak,1,2 Justyna Janocha-Litwin,1,2,4 Krzysztof Simon1,2 1Clinical Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland; 2First Department of Infectious Diseases, J. Gromkowski Specialistic Regional Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland; 3Infermedica Sp. z o. o., Wrocław, Poland; 4Novum Clinic, sp. z o. o., Wrocław, PolandCorrespondence: Anna A Nowicka, Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Koszarowa 5, Wroclaw, 51-149, Poland, Email [email protected]; [email protected]: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a recognized complication of long-term immunosuppressive or cytotoxic therapy, typically occurring during immunosuppression or within a few months after treatment. To mitigate this risk, hepatological societies recommend the use of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) for HBV reactivation prophylaxis, along with post-treatment monitoring; though, these recommendations are not universally consistent across different guidelines. We present a case of late HBV reactivation in a 76-year-old male with occult HBV infection who received rituximab-based therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In accordance with HBV reactivation guidelines, the patient was prescribed entecavir 0.5 mg daily during chemotherapy and for 18 months following the completion of hematological treatment. Despite adherence to these recommendations, the patient developed HBV reactivation 2 years and 5 months after the cessation of rituximab-based therapy, which progressed to acute HBV hepatitis. Our case emphasizes the need for extended follow-up in patients undergoing rituximab-based immunosuppression. It highlights the critical importance of vigilance for HBV reactivation and the potential consequences of delayed treatment. This case supports evidence on the unpredictability of HBV reactivation timelines and underscores the need for standardized monitoring protocols.Keywords: HBV reactivation, hepatitis B, rituximab, leukemia, HBV reactivation prophylaxis, entecavir

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Sleeping Giant: Late HBV Reactivation After Rituximab-Based Chemotherapy Despite Correct Prophylaxis

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
article

A Sleeping Giant: Late HBV Reactivation After Rituximab-Based Chemotherapy Despite Correct Prophylaxis

article en

Abstract

Anna A Nowicka,1– 3 Anna Szymanek-Pasternak,1,2 Justyna Janocha-Litwin,1,2,4 Krzysztof Simon1,2 1Clinical Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland; 2First Department of Infectious Diseases, J. Gromkowski Specialistic Regional Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland; 3Infermedica Sp. z o. o., Wrocław, Poland; 4Novum Clinic, sp. z o. o., Wrocław, PolandCorrespondence: Anna A Nowicka, Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Koszarowa 5, Wroclaw, 51-149, Poland, Email [email protected]; [email protected]: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a recognized complication of long-term immunosuppressive or cytotoxic therapy, typically occurring during immunosuppression or within a few months after treatment. To mitigate this risk, hepatological societies recommend the use of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) for HBV reactivation prophylaxis, along with post-treatment monitoring; though, these recommendations are not universally consistent across different guidelines. We present a case of late HBV reactivation in a 76-year-old male with occult HBV infection who received rituximab-based therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In accordance with HBV reactivation guidelines, the patient was prescribed entecavir 0.5 mg daily during chemotherapy and for 18 months following the completion of hematological treatment. Despite adherence to these recommendations, the patient developed HBV reactivation 2 years and 5 months after the cessation of rituximab-based therapy, which progressed to acute HBV hepatitis. Our case emphasizes the need for extended follow-up in patients undergoing rituximab-based immunosuppression. It highlights the critical importance of vigilance for HBV reactivation and the potential consequences of delayed treatment. This case supports evidence on the unpredictability of HBV reactivation timelines and underscores the need for standardized monitoring protocols.Keywords: HBV reactivation, hepatitis B, rituximab, leukemia, HBV reactivation prophylaxis, entecavir

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.