Radyoterapi Alan Hastalarda Geleneksel ve Tamamlayıcı Tıp Kullanımı ve Sağlık Algılarının Değerlendirilmesi

AbstractAim: This study aims to evaluate the attitudes of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy toward Traditional and Complementary Medicine their health perceptions, the methods they use, and the relationships between these factors. Materials and Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional, and correlational study was conducted with 82 patients receiving treatment at the Radiation Oncology Clinic of Selçuk University Faculty of Medicine Hospital. Data were collected using a demographic information form, the Attitudes Toward Traditional and Complementary Medicine Scale (TCMAS), and the Health Perception Scale (HPS). The data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 software with descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson correlation tests. Results: The mean age of participants was 56.7±10.8, with 54.9% being male, 45.1% female, and 76.8% married. Among the participants, 43.9% were in stage 2 and 31.7% in stage 3, with prostate cancer being the most common type (32.9%). A total of 52.4% of participants reported using TCM methods, with the most commonly used methods being religious practices (87.8%), manipulative approaches (massage and reflexology; 46.4%), phytotherapy (31.7%), meditation (12.2%), hypnosis (4.9%), guided imagery (2.4%), and energy approaches (Reiki, bioenergy, and healing energy; 1.2%). Of the participants, 26.8% obtained information from family, 14.7% from TV and social media, 12.2% from healthcare professionals, and 46.3% stated they had no knowledge about TCM. The mean TCMAS score was 97.21±30.74, and the mean HPS score was 43.48±9.01. Participants who perceived their economic status as poor had significantly higher TCMAS scores (p

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-27
Primary Topic
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radyoterapi Alan Hastalarda Geleneksel ve Tamamlayıcı Tıp Kullanımı ve Sağlık Algılarının Değerlendirilmesi

Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments
article

Radyoterapi Alan Hastalarda Geleneksel ve Tamamlayıcı Tıp Kullanımı ve Sağlık Algılarının Değerlendirilmesi

article en

Abstract

AbstractAim: This study aims to evaluate the attitudes of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy toward Traditional and Complementary Medicine their health perceptions, the methods they use, and the relationships between these factors. Materials and Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional, and correlational study was conducted with 82 patients receiving treatment at the Radiation Oncology Clinic of Selçuk University Faculty of Medicine Hospital. Data were collected using a demographic information form, the Attitudes Toward Traditional and Complementary Medicine Scale (TCMAS), and the Health Perception Scale (HPS). The data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 software with descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson correlation tests. Results: The mean age of participants was 56.7±10.8, with 54.9% being male, 45.1% female, and 76.8% married. Among the participants, 43.9% were in stage 2 and 31.7% in stage 3, with prostate cancer being the most common type (32.9%). A total of 52.4% of participants reported using TCM methods, with the most commonly used methods being religious practices (87.8%), manipulative approaches (massage and reflexology; 46.4%), phytotherapy (31.7%), meditation (12.2%), hypnosis (4.9%), guided imagery (2.4%), and energy approaches (Reiki, bioenergy, and healing energy; 1.2%). Of the participants, 26.8% obtained information from family, 14.7% from TV and social media, 12.2% from healthcare professionals, and 46.3% stated they had no knowledge about TCM. The mean TCMAS score was 97.21±30.74, and the mean HPS score was 43.48±9.01. Participants who perceived their economic status as poor had significantly higher TCMAS scores (p

No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.