The power of signing international agreements on behalf of the European Union:Commission v Council (Signature d'accords internationaux)

In Signature d’accords internationaux , the European Court of Justice was asked to clarify the straight-forward yet foundational legal question of who has the power to sign international agreements on behalf of the European Union. This annotation provides a detailed account of the legal arguments of the parties on the basis of their written submissions as well as a clear and concise analysis of the opinion of the Advocate General and the ECJ’s judgment. On that basis, it critically examines three main aspects of the judgment: First, the extent to which the ECJ engaged with international law; second, the legal implications of the judgment for the EU’s independent external visibility; and third, the effects of the judgment for the institutional practice of EU treaty-making. In so doing, it stresses the legal and practical relevance of the judgment for the unity and consistency in the EU’s external representation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Mobile and Web Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The power of signing international agreements on behalf of the European Union:Commission v Council (Signature d'accords internationaux)

University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Mobile and Web Applications
article

The power of signing international agreements on behalf of the European Union:Commission v Council (Signature d'accords internationaux)

article en

Abstract

In Signature d’accords internationaux , the European Court of Justice was asked to clarify the straight-forward yet foundational legal question of who has the power to sign international agreements on behalf of the European Union. This annotation provides a detailed account of the legal arguments of the parties on the basis of their written submissions as well as a clear and concise analysis of the opinion of the Advocate General and the ECJ’s judgment. On that basis, it critically examines three main aspects of the judgment: First, the extent to which the ECJ engaged with international law; second, the legal implications of the judgment for the EU’s independent external visibility; and third, the effects of the judgment for the institutional practice of EU treaty-making. In so doing, it stresses the legal and practical relevance of the judgment for the unity and consistency in the EU’s external representation.

University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Human Computer Interaction (Switzerland) (CH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Mobile and Web Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.