Pilots' Risk Perception Regarding Automation

In aviation, each decision made, no matter how big or small, is a life-or-death decision. Small mistakes could lead to large miscalculations which end in less-than-ideal situations. This study was designed to research the impact that automation has on mainly in-flight scenarios and decisions to determine how pilots’ risk perceptions change depending on various circumstances. A survey was developed and distributed to licensed pilots, who rated their perceived risk of 8 scenarios. The scenarios were designed to follow four conditions which included first person vs. third person perspective as well as automation vs no automation involved in the scenario. Results indicate that the designed inclusion of automation did not substantially affect the participants’ risk perception but mean risk ratings were higher for the third person scenarios than for the first-person scenarios. While the automation condition was non-significant, further research including larger sample sizes and increased diversity in the automation considered in the scenarios could provide additional data and better support conclusions made on this topic.

Publication Details

Journal
Bryant Digital Repository (Bryant University)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pilots' Risk Perception Regarding Automation

Bryant Digital Repository (Bryant University)
Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
article

Pilots' Risk Perception Regarding Automation

article en

Abstract

In aviation, each decision made, no matter how big or small, is a life-or-death decision. Small mistakes could lead to large miscalculations which end in less-than-ideal situations. This study was designed to research the impact that automation has on mainly in-flight scenarios and decisions to determine how pilots’ risk perceptions change depending on various circumstances. A survey was developed and distributed to licensed pilots, who rated their perceived risk of 8 scenarios. The scenarios were designed to follow four conditions which included first person vs. third person perspective as well as automation vs no automation involved in the scenario. Results indicate that the designed inclusion of automation did not substantially affect the participants’ risk perception but mean risk ratings were higher for the third person scenarios than for the first-person scenarios. While the automation condition was non-significant, further research including larger sample sizes and increased diversity in the automation considered in the scenarios could provide additional data and better support conclusions made on this topic.

Bryant Digital Repository (Bryant University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pilots' Risk Perception Regarding Automation · Bryant Digital Repository (Bryant University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS