Perceived preparedness and mental health in response to the Coronavirus pandemic in the UK population

Objectives: Preparedness levels have been shown to improve the outcomes for people who find themselves in an emergency. However, uptake of preparedness behaviours by the public prior to a major disaster is limited. This two-part study examined perceived preparedness in the UK during the first months of the Covid-19 pandemic (Study 1), and two years later (Study 2). Methods: Both studies investigated the effect of individual demographics (gender, age, perceived socioeconomic and health status) on perceived preparedness. Next, the studies examined the extent to which perceived preparedness was associated with mental health outcomes (anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms). Participants (Study 1, N = 409) completed an online survey in May to June 2020 during a national lockdown, with another sample (Study 2, N = 87) completing the same survey from March to July 2022. Results: Across both studies, participants completed two to three different preparedness activities. Greater subjective perceptions of socioeconomic status were associated with perceived preparedness. Preparedness levels were related with better mental health, and unrelated to age and gender. Conclusions: Encouraging the public to engage with preparedness behaviours may not only have practical benefits but also help to protect mental wellbeing during a disaster.

Publication Details

Journal
e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University)
Published
2025-03-04
Primary Topic
Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived preparedness and mental health in response to the Coronavirus pandemic in the UK population

e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University)
Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
article

Perceived preparedness and mental health in response to the Coronavirus pandemic in the UK population

article en

Abstract

Objectives: Preparedness levels have been shown to improve the outcomes for people who find themselves in an emergency. However, uptake of preparedness behaviours by the public prior to a major disaster is limited. This two-part study examined perceived preparedness in the UK during the first months of the Covid-19 pandemic (Study 1), and two years later (Study 2). Methods: Both studies investigated the effect of individual demographics (gender, age, perceived socioeconomic and health status) on perceived preparedness. Next, the studies examined the extent to which perceived preparedness was associated with mental health outcomes (anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms). Participants (Study 1, N = 409) completed an online survey in May to June 2020 during a national lockdown, with another sample (Study 2, N = 87) completing the same survey from March to July 2022. Results: Across both studies, participants completed two to three different preparedness activities. Greater subjective perceptions of socioeconomic status were associated with perceived preparedness. Preparedness levels were related with better mental health, and unrelated to age and gender. Conclusions: Encouraging the public to engage with preparedness behaviours may not only have practical benefits but also help to protect mental wellbeing during a disaster.

e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.