My Fault, Not AI’s Fault. Self-serving Bias Impacts Employees’ Attribution of AI Accountability

The widespread diffusion of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI)-based systems offers many opportunities, but it is also accompanied by public scandals causing harm to individuals, markets, and society. Practice and research are calling for ensuring AI accountability. However, accountability attributions are challenging because multiple actors are involved in the development, operation, and usage. It remains unclear who do employees hold accountable when using a GAI-based system. This study examined how employees attribute accountability based on their tendencies to enhance and protect their self-concept. We ran an experiment with 466 participants and compared their successful outcomes and failures when using GAI-based systems. Our experiment revealed that under success and failure scenarios, employees attribute accountability predominantly to themselves but also share attribution with other actors. Our study enriches understanding of employees' perceptions of accountability from a multi-actor’s perspective and aids in the establishment of accountability frameworks

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

My Fault, Not AI’s Fault. Self-serving Bias Impacts Employees’ Attribution of AI Accountability

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
article

My Fault, Not AI’s Fault. Self-serving Bias Impacts Employees’ Attribution of AI Accountability

article en

Abstract

The widespread diffusion of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI)-based systems offers many opportunities, but it is also accompanied by public scandals causing harm to individuals, markets, and society. Practice and research are calling for ensuring AI accountability. However, accountability attributions are challenging because multiple actors are involved in the development, operation, and usage. It remains unclear who do employees hold accountable when using a GAI-based system. This study examined how employees attribute accountability based on their tendencies to enhance and protect their self-concept. We ran an experiment with 466 participants and compared their successful outcomes and failures when using GAI-based systems. Our experiment revealed that under success and failure scenarios, employees attribute accountability predominantly to themselves but also share attribution with other actors. Our study enriches understanding of employees' perceptions of accountability from a multi-actor’s perspective and aids in the establishment of accountability frameworks

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.