Neither fair nor legal. How and why untrustworthy digital ecosystems evolve

Untrustworthy technologies create systemic harms for their users, often by design, and at the societal level. However, the nature of these technologies and the reasons why they evolve have not yet been well investigated. This research proposes a framework for conceptualising untrustworthy technologies as an ecosystem-level dark side phenomenon. Using a novel sensemaking model, we explore how values are encoded within a technology artefact through the contexts, conditions and ideologies of its conception, and how they may manifest as signals of untrustworthiness. We then illustrate the phenomenon through a critical realist, causal study of the dynamics that enabled and sustained the Robodebt social welfare scandal. We argue for the importance and necessity of moral evaluation of untrustworthy technologies, especially in the low optionality, high consequence settings of algorithmically determined social welfare programmes. This study enhances understanding of untrustworthy technology and its characteristics as a new entry to the dark side canon. The proposed model and techniques provide a foundation to guide future research in this critical area.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-31
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neither fair nor legal. How and why untrustworthy digital ecosystems evolve

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Neither fair nor legal. How and why untrustworthy digital ecosystems evolve

article en

Abstract

Untrustworthy technologies create systemic harms for their users, often by design, and at the societal level. However, the nature of these technologies and the reasons why they evolve have not yet been well investigated. This research proposes a framework for conceptualising untrustworthy technologies as an ecosystem-level dark side phenomenon. Using a novel sensemaking model, we explore how values are encoded within a technology artefact through the contexts, conditions and ideologies of its conception, and how they may manifest as signals of untrustworthiness. We then illustrate the phenomenon through a critical realist, causal study of the dynamics that enabled and sustained the Robodebt social welfare scandal. We argue for the importance and necessity of moral evaluation of untrustworthy technologies, especially in the low optionality, high consequence settings of algorithmically determined social welfare programmes. This study enhances understanding of untrustworthy technology and its characteristics as a new entry to the dark side canon. The proposed model and techniques provide a foundation to guide future research in this critical area.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.