Liability Limitations of Stock Exchange Maintenance Rules

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 obligates individual exchanges and dealer associations to exercise a limited duty of self-regulation. The exchanges and associations have met their responsibility by promulgating rules governing the conduct of their members, including the exchange margin maintenance rules. For many years, enforcement of the rules was left to the exchanges and to the Securities Exchange Commission. Recently, however, courts and commentators have discussed and undertaken judicial enforcement of exchange rules by implying an investor's cause of action against a broker or dealer from the power of the federal courts to effectuate the purposes of the Securities Exchange Act. Present law in the area of implied civil liability for exchange rule violations is inconclusive, suggesting that only those rules which recapitulate a provision of the federal regulations are actionable. This Comment considers whether a broker should be civilly liable for violation of the exchange margin rules in the context of the governmental policy behind the rules and their function in the federal regulatory scheme.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-04-08
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liability Limitations of Stock Exchange Maintenance Rules

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

Liability Limitations of Stock Exchange Maintenance Rules

article en

Abstract

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 obligates individual exchanges and dealer associations to exercise a limited duty of self-regulation. The exchanges and associations have met their responsibility by promulgating rules governing the conduct of their members, including the exchange margin maintenance rules. For many years, enforcement of the rules was left to the exchanges and to the Securities Exchange Commission. Recently, however, courts and commentators have discussed and undertaken judicial enforcement of exchange rules by implying an investor's cause of action against a broker or dealer from the power of the federal courts to effectuate the purposes of the Securities Exchange Act. Present law in the area of implied civil liability for exchange rule violations is inconclusive, suggesting that only those rules which recapitulate a provision of the federal regulations are actionable. This Comment considers whether a broker should be civilly liable for violation of the exchange margin rules in the context of the governmental policy behind the rules and their function in the federal regulatory scheme.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.