Influencing Factors (History of Alcohol Consumption) and Construction of a Nomogram Prediction Model for In-Hospital Gastrointestinal Bleeding Secondary to Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage in a Certain Hospital

Peng Ye,1 Yeting Luo2 1Department of Gastroenterology, Ganzhou People’s Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, 341000, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Neurology, Ganzhou People’s Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, 341000, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Yeting Luo, Department of Neurology, Ganzhou People’s Hospital, No. 17 Hongqi Avenue, Zhanggong District, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, 341000, People’s Republic of China, Tel +8615970088967, Email [email protected]: To investigate the factors influencing acute cerebral hemorrhage (ACH) secondary to nosocomial gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GIH) and construct a nomogram prediction model.Methods: A total of 500 ACH patients admitted to our hospital from August 2022 to August 2024 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into a modeling group (350 cases) and a validation group (150 cases) in a 7:3 ratio. Patients in the modeling group were further divided into the GIH and non-GIH groups. Clinical data were collected, and multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors. A nomogram model was constructed using R software. The predictive performance was evaluated using the ROC curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).Results: Among 500 patients, 78 (15.6%) developed GIH. In the modeling group (350 cases), 56 (16.0%) had GIH. There were significant differences in age, history of coronary heart disease, history of alcohol consumption, NIHSS score, systolic blood pressure, and hemorrhage volume between groups (P< 0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified these factors as independent risk factors for secondary GIH (P< 0.05). The Area Under Curve(AUC) was 0.798 in the modeling group and 0.978 in the validation group, with calibration curves showing good agreement between predicted and observed values (Hosmer-Lemeshow(H-L) test: modeling group, χ²=7.156, P=0.732; validation group, χ²=7.015, P=0.703). DCA indicated a high clinical application value when the probability ranged from 0.06 to 0.95.Conclusion: Age, history of coronary heart disease, history of alcohol consumption, NIHSS score, systolic blood pressure, and hemorrhage volume are key risk factors for secondary GIH in ACH patients. The nomogram model constructed based on these factors demonstrates good predictive performance and clinical application value. It can help clinicians prevent early onset and reduce the risk of bleeding in patients.Keywords: acute cerebral haemorrhage, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, influencing factors, nomogram

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influencing Factors (History of Alcohol Consumption) and Construction of a Nomogram Prediction Model for In-Hospital Gastrointestinal Bleeding Secondary to Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage in a Certain Hospital

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Influencing Factors (History of Alcohol Consumption) and Construction of a Nomogram Prediction Model for In-Hospital Gastrointestinal Bleeding Secondary to Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage in a Certain Hospital

article en

Abstract

Peng Ye,1 Yeting Luo2 1Department of Gastroenterology, Ganzhou People’s Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, 341000, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Neurology, Ganzhou People’s Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, 341000, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Yeting Luo, Department of Neurology, Ganzhou People’s Hospital, No. 17 Hongqi Avenue, Zhanggong District, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, 341000, People’s Republic of China, Tel +8615970088967, Email [email protected]: To investigate the factors influencing acute cerebral hemorrhage (ACH) secondary to nosocomial gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GIH) and construct a nomogram prediction model.Methods: A total of 500 ACH patients admitted to our hospital from August 2022 to August 2024 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into a modeling group (350 cases) and a validation group (150 cases) in a 7:3 ratio. Patients in the modeling group were further divided into the GIH and non-GIH groups. Clinical data were collected, and multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors. A nomogram model was constructed using R software. The predictive performance was evaluated using the ROC curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).Results: Among 500 patients, 78 (15.6%) developed GIH. In the modeling group (350 cases), 56 (16.0%) had GIH. There were significant differences in age, history of coronary heart disease, history of alcohol consumption, NIHSS score, systolic blood pressure, and hemorrhage volume between groups (P< 0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified these factors as independent risk factors for secondary GIH (P< 0.05). The Area Under Curve(AUC) was 0.798 in the modeling group and 0.978 in the validation group, with calibration curves showing good agreement between predicted and observed values (Hosmer-Lemeshow(H-L) test: modeling group, χ²=7.156, P=0.732; validation group, χ²=7.015, P=0.703). DCA indicated a high clinical application value when the probability ranged from 0.06 to 0.95.Conclusion: Age, history of coronary heart disease, history of alcohol consumption, NIHSS score, systolic blood pressure, and hemorrhage volume are key risk factors for secondary GIH in ACH patients. The nomogram model constructed based on these factors demonstrates good predictive performance and clinical application value. It can help clinicians prevent early onset and reduce the risk of bleeding in patients.Keywords: acute cerebral haemorrhage, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, influencing factors, nomogram

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.