Identifying and benchmarking polar research - bibliometric issues and implications

This paper explores the challenge of identifying Antarctic polar research using conventional keyword searches, and examines the way these approaches can be used for benchmarking the bibliometric impact of polar research. It reviews existing work to identify bibliometric methodologies for Antarctic research outputs, and examines their effectiveness in extracting Antarctic-specific literature from the field of polar research as a whole. It reviews keywords used, including geographical search terms, and identifies issues that may affect metrics for countries with a strong bi-polar focus, well as measures taken to refine and constrain the search parameters in specific databases. Secondly, this paper seeks to benchmark the current impact of Antarctic polar research against global patterns in scientific research. It seeks to establish whether some observed changes in citation patterns are specific to the field or part of a global trend, looking at the citation impact historically compared to recent years.

Publication Details

Journal
NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Polar Research and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying and benchmarking polar research - bibliometric issues and implications

NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council)
Polar Research and Ecology
article

Identifying and benchmarking polar research - bibliometric issues and implications

article en

Abstract

This paper explores the challenge of identifying Antarctic polar research using conventional keyword searches, and examines the way these approaches can be used for benchmarking the bibliometric impact of polar research. It reviews existing work to identify bibliometric methodologies for Antarctic research outputs, and examines their effectiveness in extracting Antarctic-specific literature from the field of polar research as a whole. It reviews keywords used, including geographical search terms, and identifies issues that may affect metrics for countries with a strong bi-polar focus, well as measures taken to refine and constrain the search parameters in specific databases. Secondly, this paper seeks to benchmark the current impact of Antarctic polar research against global patterns in scientific research. It seeks to establish whether some observed changes in citation patterns are specific to the field or part of a global trend, looking at the citation impact historically compared to recent years.

NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Polar Research and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.