An Examination of Civil Asset Forfeiture in South Carolina

Civil asset forfeiture allows the government to seize and forfeit property that is associated with criminal activity without arresting or charging the property owner. Although expansive in its potential application, little is understood about the characteristics of civil asset forfeiture cases, the property owners involved in forfeiture cases, or the characteristics of any criminal cases pursued parallel to the civil cases. Utilizing open-source, public court records, this dissertation provides an exploratory analysis of these gaps in the literature by examining the types of civil asset forfeiture used, the value of asset forfeiture cases, how money from asset forfeiture is divided by the seizing agencies, the criminal charges and criminal case dispositions associated with asset forfeiture cases, and the racial and ethnic groups most impacted by civil asset forfeiture. The findings provide evidence of a substantial racial disparity in the application of civil asset forfeiture and call into question the crime control justification for civil asset forfeiture.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
Published
2024-10-01
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Examination of Civil Asset Forfeiture in South Carolina

Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

An Examination of Civil Asset Forfeiture in South Carolina

article en

Abstract

Civil asset forfeiture allows the government to seize and forfeit property that is associated with criminal activity without arresting or charging the property owner. Although expansive in its potential application, little is understood about the characteristics of civil asset forfeiture cases, the property owners involved in forfeiture cases, or the characteristics of any criminal cases pursued parallel to the civil cases. Utilizing open-source, public court records, this dissertation provides an exploratory analysis of these gaps in the literature by examining the types of civil asset forfeiture used, the value of asset forfeiture cases, how money from asset forfeiture is divided by the seizing agencies, the criminal charges and criminal case dispositions associated with asset forfeiture cases, and the racial and ethnic groups most impacted by civil asset forfeiture. The findings provide evidence of a substantial racial disparity in the application of civil asset forfeiture and call into question the crime control justification for civil asset forfeiture.

Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.