Co-designing social change – Reviewing some methods and tools

This short paper came about when engaging with Cecilia Casas, who asked us and Dr Yanki Lee to share co-design methods and tools at the ESDA (Escuela Superior de Diseño de Aragón) DESIS Social Design Days III (Zaragoza, March 2024). We were asked to discuss the involvement of participants in equitable co-creation and reflect on how best to manage the relationship between what Manzini (2015) calls ‘expert designers’ (those who are design trained) and what he calls ‘diffuse designers’ (those who are not trained in design yet play a crucial role in delivering democratic design solutions). Manzini (2015) suggests designers should be ‘facilitators’, ‘mediators’ and ‘catalysts’ in the context of design for social innovation, but his work also recognizes that ‘context is everything’. Drawing on our experience of social innovation projects with prisoners (Gamman & Caulfield, 2023) and refugees (Morgado and Mazzarella, 2024), we were aware that not all approaches to co-design can be automatically transferable to different political and geographic landscapes. We found it tricky to translate our UK-based approach for a workshop in a Spanish context, but a helpful dialogue developed with colleagues from ESDA.

Publication Details

Journal
University of the Arts London Research Online (University of the Arts London)
Published
2024-11-28
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-designing social change – Reviewing some methods and tools

University of the Arts London Research Online (University of the Arts London)
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

Co-designing social change – Reviewing some methods and tools

article en

Abstract

This short paper came about when engaging with Cecilia Casas, who asked us and Dr Yanki Lee to share co-design methods and tools at the ESDA (Escuela Superior de Diseño de Aragón) DESIS Social Design Days III (Zaragoza, March 2024). We were asked to discuss the involvement of participants in equitable co-creation and reflect on how best to manage the relationship between what Manzini (2015) calls ‘expert designers’ (those who are design trained) and what he calls ‘diffuse designers’ (those who are not trained in design yet play a crucial role in delivering democratic design solutions). Manzini (2015) suggests designers should be ‘facilitators’, ‘mediators’ and ‘catalysts’ in the context of design for social innovation, but his work also recognizes that ‘context is everything’. Drawing on our experience of social innovation projects with prisoners (Gamman & Caulfield, 2023) and refugees (Morgado and Mazzarella, 2024), we were aware that not all approaches to co-design can be automatically transferable to different political and geographic landscapes. We found it tricky to translate our UK-based approach for a workshop in a Spanish context, but a helpful dialogue developed with colleagues from ESDA.

University of the Arts London Research Online (University of the Arts London)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.