DACA's Major Questions Exception

The Supreme Court has extracted a new role as the gatekeeper of administrative action under the major questions doctrine. Underlying the doctrine is an understanding that agencies cannot act to address policy issues implicating questions of great political and economic significance unless specifically authorized by Congress. However, DACA presents a different question that should be exempted from the major questions doctrine. This is because DACA relies on two levels of executive authority: statutory—under the Immigration and Nationality Act and the Homeland Security Act—and constitutional—under the Take Care Clause. Because, as this Article explains, the two authorities cannot be disentangled, courts should not use the major questions doctrine as a form of constitutional avoidance and instead should determine whether the Take Care Clause authorizes the executive branch to institute deferred action programs like DACA.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DACA's Major Questions Exception

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
article

DACA's Major Questions Exception

article en

Abstract

The Supreme Court has extracted a new role as the gatekeeper of administrative action under the major questions doctrine. Underlying the doctrine is an understanding that agencies cannot act to address policy issues implicating questions of great political and economic significance unless specifically authorized by Congress. However, DACA presents a different question that should be exempted from the major questions doctrine. This is because DACA relies on two levels of executive authority: statutory—under the Immigration and Nationality Act and the Homeland Security Act—and constitutional—under the Take Care Clause. Because, as this Article explains, the two authorities cannot be disentangled, courts should not use the major questions doctrine as a form of constitutional avoidance and instead should determine whether the Take Care Clause authorizes the executive branch to institute deferred action programs like DACA.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

DACA's Major Questions Exception · eYLS (Yale Law School) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS