Comparison of the Effects of Ciprofol and Propofol on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Hysteroscopy

Huaming Zhang,&ast; Min Zhang,&ast; Lina Hao, Qianqian Li, Qijian Li, Jia Yang, Yanhu Xie Department of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Yanhu Xie, Email [email protected]: To evaluate and compare the effects of ciprofol and propofol on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing outpatient hysteroscopy.Design: Double-blind randomized controlled trial.Methods: This study included 1104 patients scheduled for elective outpatient hysteroscopy. Patients were randomly grouped to ciprofol Group (Group C, n = 539) and propofol Group (Group P, n = 547). Anesthesia was induced by sufentanil 0.1 ug/kg combined with ciprofol 0.3mg/kg or propofol 2.5mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained by ciprofol 1 to 1.5mg/kg/h or propofol 3 to 5mg/kg/h. The primary outcome of the study was PONV after surgery 1h and 24h. Secondary outcomes included heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), SpO2 before anesthesia (T1), 3 min after anesthesia (T2) and at the end of surgery (T3); the time of consciousness loss, recovery, hysteroscopy and discharge; and the incidence of adverse drug reactions such as hypotension, respiratory depression, bradycardia and injection pain was recorded in the two groups.Results: Compared with group P, MAP and SpO2 at T2 were significantly increased in group C (P< 0.05). Although there was no significant difference in the incidence of PONV at 1h and 24h after surgery between 2 groups (P > 0.05), the incidence of hypotension, injection pain and respiratory depression in group C were significantly reduced, compared with group P. (P< 0.05).Conclusion: Compared with propofol, ciprofol has a similar incidence of PONV and lower adverse effects such as hypotension, injection pain and respiratory depression in outpatient hysteroscopy.Keywords: postoperative nausea and vomiting, ciprofol, propofol, hysteroscopy

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Nausea and vomiting management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Effects of Ciprofol and Propofol on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Hysteroscopy

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Nausea and vomiting management
article

Comparison of the Effects of Ciprofol and Propofol on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Hysteroscopy

article en

Abstract

Huaming Zhang,&ast; Min Zhang,&ast; Lina Hao, Qianqian Li, Qijian Li, Jia Yang, Yanhu Xie Department of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Yanhu Xie, Email [email protected]: To evaluate and compare the effects of ciprofol and propofol on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing outpatient hysteroscopy.Design: Double-blind randomized controlled trial.Methods: This study included 1104 patients scheduled for elective outpatient hysteroscopy. Patients were randomly grouped to ciprofol Group (Group C, n = 539) and propofol Group (Group P, n = 547). Anesthesia was induced by sufentanil 0.1 ug/kg combined with ciprofol 0.3mg/kg or propofol 2.5mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained by ciprofol 1 to 1.5mg/kg/h or propofol 3 to 5mg/kg/h. The primary outcome of the study was PONV after surgery 1h and 24h. Secondary outcomes included heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), SpO2 before anesthesia (T1), 3 min after anesthesia (T2) and at the end of surgery (T3); the time of consciousness loss, recovery, hysteroscopy and discharge; and the incidence of adverse drug reactions such as hypotension, respiratory depression, bradycardia and injection pain was recorded in the two groups.Results: Compared with group P, MAP and SpO2 at T2 were significantly increased in group C (P< 0.05). Although there was no significant difference in the incidence of PONV at 1h and 24h after surgery between 2 groups (P > 0.05), the incidence of hypotension, injection pain and respiratory depression in group C were significantly reduced, compared with group P. (P< 0.05).Conclusion: Compared with propofol, ciprofol has a similar incidence of PONV and lower adverse effects such as hypotension, injection pain and respiratory depression in outpatient hysteroscopy.Keywords: postoperative nausea and vomiting, ciprofol, propofol, hysteroscopy

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Nausea and vomiting management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.