Better the Devil You Don’t Know. Perceived Discrimination Increases Positive Evaluation of AI Recruiting Decisions.

Recruiting is one of the most controversial and sensitive use cases of AI due to the potential impact on the life of job seekers. Thus, on the one hand, regulators introduce new regulations on AI classifying recruiting as high-risk use case. On the other hand, technology research shows AI could reduce discrimination. One perspective is still unknown: How do discriminated people perceive the application of AI in recruiting? The paper investigates how discriminated people perceive the use of AI in recruiting and how transparency of AI decisions influences this perception. We conducted a lab-in-the-field experiment using an online questionnaire yielding a random sample of (N = 1335) unemployed registered with the Austrian Public Unemployment Service. We show that perceived everyday discrimination increases the positive overall evaluation of AI decisions in recruiting. Evaluating regulatory requirements and technical features should also explicitly take discriminated groups into account.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Better the Devil You Don’t Know. Perceived Discrimination Increases Positive Evaluation of AI Recruiting Decisions.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts
article

Better the Devil You Don’t Know. Perceived Discrimination Increases Positive Evaluation of AI Recruiting Decisions.

article en

Abstract

Recruiting is one of the most controversial and sensitive use cases of AI due to the potential impact on the life of job seekers. Thus, on the one hand, regulators introduce new regulations on AI classifying recruiting as high-risk use case. On the other hand, technology research shows AI could reduce discrimination. One perspective is still unknown: How do discriminated people perceive the application of AI in recruiting? The paper investigates how discriminated people perceive the use of AI in recruiting and how transparency of AI decisions influences this perception. We conducted a lab-in-the-field experiment using an online questionnaire yielding a random sample of (N = 1335) unemployed registered with the Austrian Public Unemployment Service. We show that perceived everyday discrimination increases the positive overall evaluation of AI decisions in recruiting. Evaluating regulatory requirements and technical features should also explicitly take discriminated groups into account.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.